Home
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
> Delaware Public Forums > Dover Public Issues Forum > Library Merger Mulled -- Proposal gets mixed reaction from crowd

Library Merger Mulled -- Proposal gets mixed reaction from crowd
 Moderated by: webteam Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page  
 New Topic   Reply   Printer Friendly 
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Thu Feb 4th, 2010 09:45 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
1st Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I don't think you can discuss common sense with the patriarchs and matriarchs of Dover.



 Posted: Thu Feb 4th, 2010 01:38 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
2nd Post
Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Cam-Wyo
Posts: 664
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

NO TAX INCREASE FOR ANYONE IN THE COUNTY BUT DOVER RESIDENTS, WHO SHOULD SEE A REDUCTION IN THEI TOWN PROPERTY TAXES AS THEY GET OUT OF THE LIBRARY BUSINESS!



 Posted: Thu Feb 4th, 2010 01:37 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
3rd Post
Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Cam-Wyo
Posts: 664
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

And the future "cost avoidance" that would affect the pocket books of county residents? It refers to a County Library Plan that included the construction of three libraries, one in the north, one in the central, and one in the south of the county. With Harrington and Smyrna, THAT is NEVER going to happen. But like other comments from one of the municipalities, it is anecdotal and meant as a blatant attempt to get attention. The presentation mentioned "duplication of services". You eliminate duplication of services by combining services or eliminating one of them, in either case, they would have the County Library eliminated.
Here is an idea, eliminate the Dover Library, give two million dollars or so to the County, and we will buy three more units at Longacre including the second floor, add inside steps to the second floor and use it for offices, program areas, minimal bookshelves or periodical shelves, and computer labs (won't support all bookshelves), add a mezzanine in the main library, and the County Library becomes the anchor library for Central Kent County. Dover gets out of the library business, we add the Library Tax to Dover residents to fund the increased operational costs of the County Anchor library, and everyone wins!



 Posted: Thu Feb 4th, 2010 01:23 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
4th Post
Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Cam-Wyo
Posts: 664
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I have not seen the actual plans for the Harrington or Smyrna library construction. I did not need to see Dover's either to decide that I applaud their efforts to expand library services. During my campaigning, I even signed the petition in support of the Dover Library. The petition WAS NOT identified as a petition to force Kent County to contribute.

Regardless, what I do NOT support is funding the libraries with County funds. #1, we do not have the money. #2, it is not a good economy to construct a large new building. #3, it is not good for county residents. #4, ask Milford how much they asked for from the County...$0.



 Posted: Wed Feb 3rd, 2010 09:02 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
5th Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

There is a large difference between Library Services and Brick & Mortar buildings.  Kent County does a fine job of providing services in the County.  That has nothing to do with physical structures.

Kent County provides a County Library and coordinates services among the various towns.

If the City of Dover wants a palace, please feel free to build it with City funds.  The same goes for each and every town in the County.



 Posted: Wed Feb 3rd, 2010 03:17 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
6th Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

What do you think?
From the Delaware State News:

Kent towns hope for library solutions
Officials meet with Levy Court on funding

By Al Kemp


Delaware State News


DOVER — If your local library doesn’t stock the book or movie you came to borrow, chances are good that the item can be ordered from somewhere else in the system, be it a state library, a county library or any of Delaware’s numerous municipal libraries.


That’s because library resources are freely shared in the state. But if resources can be so freely shared, why not the responsibilities?


That was the question that representatives from Dover, Smyrna and Harrington put to the Kent County Levy Court commissioners during Tuesday night’s business meeting.


"The managers and library directors from Smyrna, Dover and Harrington come to you in the spirit of cooperation," said Smyrna Town Manager David S. Hugg III. "We desire to work together to find solutions to the rapidly increasing need for expanded and sustained library services throughout the county. … We are asking that you join us in planning for and developing financing options to avoid duplication and better help meet the needs of library patrons countywide."


Mr. Hugg was joined by town manager John Schatzschneider of Harrington and city manager Tony DePrima of Dover in asking the county commissioners to pitch in about $5 million for the planned library expansions, which represents about 25 percent of the total cost in Smyrna and Harrington, and about 10 percent of the total cost in Dover.


"We believe there’s a true cost avoidance that Levy Court should consider in the long run," Mr. DePrima said.


When Commissioner George "Jody" Sweeney asked where the savings would come from, Mr. DePrima replied that "the savings come from not having to build another Kent County library."


Mr. Schatzschneider said that the coalition came to Kent County Levy Court with the best interests of Kent County residents in mind.


Commissioner Bradley S. Eaby told the delegation that he supported trying to find a way to make the partnership work.


"I think the best way to do it is to partner," he said.


Commissioner Eric Buckson said: "I don’t think we can afford this in the foreseeable future."


Speaking strictly for Smyrna, Mr. Hugg said the town library serves a population that goes far beyond town limits.


"We service an area that runs from Cheswold to Townsend, not just the town in Smyrna," he said.


Mr. Buckson challenged the group’s statistics on library users who come from outside town limits.


"We’d like to know who any people truly come from unincorporated areas of Kent County," he said. "Is there a way to tell how many are coming from Buffalo, N.Y., and how many are from Kent County?"


"From my perspective we’re extending an olive branch," Mr. Hugg said before the meeting. "We’re asking for a cooperative approach to library services countywide."


Staff writer Al Kemp may be reached at 741-8296 or akemp@newszap.com.



Check It Out


Dover Public Library has 39,354 cardholders, 51 percent of whom reside out of the city limits. The library has 17,000 square feet of usable space. The city plans to build a 46,000-square-foot facility, at a cost of $22 million.



Smyrna Public Library has 9,376 cardholders, with 54 percent of them residing out of the town limits. The library has 4,075 square feet of usable space. The town plans to build a 25,000-square-foot facility, with construction slated for 2013 and 2014, at a cost of $7.5 million.



The Harrington Library has 3,769 cardholders, with 59.7 percent of them residing outside the town limits. The library has 2,300 square feet of usable space. A new 10,000-square-foot to 12,000-square-foot building is planned within the next two to five years, at a cost of $1.8 million to $3 million.



Source: Kent County Municipal
Library Coalition

Last edited on Wed Feb 3rd, 2010 03:28 pm by tspong



 Posted: Tue Jan 5th, 2010 09:34 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
7th Post
GadgetGal
Member
 

Joined: Tue Dec 22nd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 11
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

It would be good if Dover could work better with the county but I don't see that happening.  When the issue with the library came up, Mr. DePrima and crew were not willing to budge on location.  The location by the post office is not easily accessible and parking is an issue.  They have some pie in the sky idea that building it there will somehow revitalize downtown.   Not sure how that will help as it is just as close to downtown now and isn't helping.  They would also like to see a much bigger and more expensive library than what is really needed.  The county did not see the need for something so grand and did not like the location.  Dover was unwilling to compromise on anything so the county walked away.  Unless both sides are willng to bend then they will never accomplish anything together.  I haven't seen any signs that Dover is willing to bend. 



 Posted: Mon Jan 4th, 2010 04:32 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
8th Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

What do you think?


From the Delaware State News:


One for the books in Kent

Year dominated by Dover, county library disagreements


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — Libraries are renowned as quiet places, but they were the subject of plenty of hollering in 2009 in Kent County. And it may take more than a librarian’s stern "Shh!" to prevent the volume from rising again this year.


The noise began late last winter with a suggestion that the county and the city of Dover consolidate their library services, perhaps by closing the county library in Camden and the city library on South State Street and replacing those facilities with a single large, state-of-the-art "anchor library" next to Dover City Hall.


Other options were discussed, such as maintaining separate county and city libraries while establishing one board to manage both. But the single-library proposal quickly overshadowed the rest.


The idea, according to its proponents, would save money for both the county and the city while providing other benefits. The city would donate the project site, making land acquisition unnecessary. Downtown Dover would gain a handsome addition. And Kent County residents would enjoy a library more modern and comfortable than any other in Delaware, one suitable not just for viewing and borrowing materials, but also for community meetings and events.


Most funding would come from grants and donations. City Council and Kent County Levy Court were to kick in $3.7 million apiece in addition to the city’s donation of land.


City Council liked the proposal. Levy Court never warmed up to it.


Fans of the Camden library objected to driving to Dover. Other county residents said Dover was an acceptable location, but only if the library were on a main route such as U.S. 13 or U.S. 113. Some said Dover’s plan was a nice dream, but unrealistically ambitious — especially in a year when city police were furloughed, county taxes went up and the unemployment rate soared.


By October, not only was there no compromise and no cost-saving consolidation, but City Council and Levy Court had headed in different directions. Each had decided to create a new library of its own, and Levy Court had formally rejected the possibility of joining the city in managing libraries.


Dover was firm in its intention to build a $22 million facility next to City Hall. Levy Court paid $1.4 million for a property in the Longacre Village shopping center, north of Woodside, where it plans a modern successor to its library — albeit a replacement considerably more modest than that envisioned by the city.


Along the way, Levy Court briefly entertained an opportunity to purchase a potential library site next to Brecknock Park in north Camden –- in Dover’s back yard, critics fumed. Such a location, they said, would create needless competition for the Dover library while putting many rural residents even farther from a public library.


The county abandoned that idea in November, but not before annoyed Dover residents — fed up with county library decisions they labeled irresponsible — resurrected a question that may generate plenty more debate: Why should they pay county taxes to support a county library and other county services they do not need? Dover has its own library, they noted, and provides its own parks, recreation programs, building inspections, planning and zoning. Dover residents pay for both the city services they use and the county services they do not use.


They want a break from so-called double taxation. City Council has called for the state legislature to provide one, not only for Dover but for every municipality in Kent whose services are duplicated by the county.


According to a handful of informal estimates, annual savings for typical homeowners in incorporated communities might be anywhere from a few bucks to nearly $100, depending on how many services a town provides and how the tax adjustment were implemented. The savings on commercial and industrial properties could be substantially greater.


New Castle County’s property tax system provides such relief to municipal property owners. For decades, Dover has called for a similar system in Kent.


But Levy Court traditionally has opposed the change, and state legislators with large rural constituencies in Kent County have blocked bills that would raise the taxes of out-of-town residents to compensate for the tax breaks that would go to residents of Dover and other municipalities.


Nonetheless, City Council voted 7-2 Dec. 14 to try again.


If the hollering about libraries has subsided, with Levy Court and City Council grudgingly agreeing to disagree, hollering about taxes may be barely under way.


What went wrong?


Why didn’t the county and the city reach an accord on libraries, or at least get closer to reaching one?


Levy Court Commissioner Allan F. Angel, whose district includes part of Dover, said discussion soured amid talk of operating a single library, with that library next to City Hall.


"It turned territorial," he recalled last week.


"I don’t think we’re working together because some people’s minds are closed," Mr. Angel said. "Some city people, when you start talking, say, ‘It’s a done deal.’"


He served on a committee that helped draw up plans for a new Dover library, but said his advice went unheeded. If the library were to be downtown, he said, it would be better farther west on Loockerman Street where vacant lots and the unoccupied former Bayard Hotel are obvious holes in the commercial district.


He also advocated consideration of commercial complexes in Dover, including the Blue Hen Corporate Center, where buildings are available for conversion and off-street parking is plentiful.


But others contend the chosen location for a new Dover library is superb: It offers free land and the opportunity to create from scratch an energy-efficient building ideally suited for its intended use. An existing store or office space, they say, has far fewer possibilities and likely would be within easy walking distance of many fewer homes.


Dover mayoral candidate Nancy H. Wagner said the city-county disharmony over libraries might have been avoided if the two governments had discussed the subject longer.


"I would like to have seen the two groups working together several years ago, before things moved very far along," said the former state representative, who will oppose incumbent Mayor Carleton E. Carey Sr. on city ballots in April. "I think we have a missed opportunity."


Mayor Carey was unavailable for comment last week.


There was work behind the scenes by the two governments’ chief administrators, City Manager Anthony J. DePrima and County Administrator Michael Petit de Mange. In March, they presented several options at a public meeting, but the session was dominated by concern over the possible closing of the county library.


"My expectation," Mr. DePrima said, "was Mike (Petit de Mange) and I would get the OK to take it to the next step" — more serious consideration of some sort of consolidated effort.


But that chance faded in June when Levy Court voted 5-2 to keep its library service independent. Levy Court also rejected the proposed financial contribution to a new Dover library.


Soon after, Dover resident N.C. Vasuki, formerly the top executive of Delaware Solid Waste Authority, launched the campaign to re-examine the county tax structure.


"In effect you’re telling the city of Dover, which gives you 26 percent of your revenue, that you don’t really care about them," he told Levy Court commissioners at their fateful June meeting. "I get nothing in return for the taxes I pay. Nothing."


County officials strongly dispute that, of course, pointing first to the county-paid paramedics who respond virtually every day to emergencies in the city.


Looking back, Mr. DePrima notes that the proposal for consolidation came at the same time as the proposal for the county to chip in $3.7 million, and both came at one of the more trying times for Levy Court.


The county officials, long proud of maintaining one of the region’s lowest property-tax rates, were on the verge of increasing that tax — along with cutting employee benefits — in response to a severe decline in revenue.


Maybe, Mr. DePrima said, consolidation and the $3.5 million request should have been addressed separately.


In addition, the needs of the other Kent County community libraries — in Smyrna, Harrington and Milford — could have received more attention at that time, he said. Both Smyrna and Harrington, like Dover, say their libraries no longer are adequate.


"In 20-20 hindsight, perhaps we shouldn’t have made this about the Dover library," Mr. DePrima said.


In fact, discussion of all town libraries in Kent may be on a Levy Court agenda soon. Mr. DePrima said municipal leaders expect to make a united presentation to the county in February.


Through thick and thin


Despite the ill will over libraries and the taxation issue, the county and the city help each other daily.


They cooperate in the regional sewage-treatment system overseen by the county. County paramedics serve the city. Dover provides county residents with an indoor sports facility, the John W. Pitts Center. Levy Court and City Council each contributed to the establishment of the new Vietnam veterans memorial on South Little Creek Road.


"I think the city and county have very good cooperation on a number of issues," said Levy Court Commissioner Bradley S. Eaby, whose district includes those parts of Dover not represented by Mr. Angel.


But the idea of joining forces on libraries, he said, was "a new, unknown entity. This was a big leap for people."


He and Eric L. Buckson were the only commissioners to support it.


Still, Mr. Eaby said, that failed attempt could lead to similar efforts where success might be more likely. He cited parks and recreation as an area in which money might be saved by having the county, the city or an independent body take over the service.


City Council President Beverly C. Williams said she is confident the library controversy won’t be a lingering sore point.


"I am very optimistic," she said. "I have been in contact with (Levy Court President P.) Brooks Banta almost every week. We are both optimistic we can get past this."


Said Mr. Banta, who has been among the more vigorous detractors of the city’s effort to revamp the county property tax, "The current Levy Court, I can tell you, is always ready to work with City Council."


The city, he said, could eliminate one duplicated service by giving up the economic development office it opened in 2008.


"For the city of Dover to have its own economic development czar — and I’m not criticizing the individual (William G. Neaton) — is a duplication and a waste of money," Mr. Banta said. "That’s one example where we could work as a team."


Ms. Williams said she, too, believes a single economic development effort would suffice.


Mr. Neaton sees it differently: "The more people doing economic development in current economic conditions, the better off we are."


City Councilman Eugene B. Ruane questioned whether county officials would be of much help to Kent towns trying to revitalize their downtowns. "It’s very difficult to get them to focus on municipal business districts," he said. "They seem focused on industrial parks and aeroparks."


But he, too, has called for greater cooperation, naming animal control as a service where a unified effort might prove efficient.


Mr. Ruane has led City Council’s current push for tax relief. He and Mr. Vasuki plan to meet this week with officials of Wilmington, whose residents pay far less in property taxes than do residents of unincorporated areas of New Castle County. If Dover homeowners’ taxes were reduced by the same percentage as Wilmington owners’, they would save an average of more than $90 a year, Mr. Ruane has estimated.


Mr. Angel’s "rough guesstimate" put the average savings at $69.


But city residents, Mr. Angel said, should recognize that more than 60 percent of the county’s paramedic calls are in Dover. "The $69 difference is well worth the cost of saving somebody’s life."


Ms. Wagner has heard it all before.


As a state representative, she took the city’s side on the tax issue, introducing several bills to reform the system. None of those proposals succeeded. She predicts a 2010 version of the proposal will fare no differently.


"I’m a realist. I don’t think it will pass the Senate," she said. "Instead of being mad (about matters on which the county and city disagree), let’s move forward in a different way by seeing how we can work together."


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.



 Posted: Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 06:00 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
9th Post
d-outof-dover-is-over
Member
 

Joined: Wed Dec 2nd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 4
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Fred wrote: I would think they would look either to the Blue Hen Corporate center because it would be cheap, or in the industrial park in West Dover....but I do think a small walk up center in the city would be nice.
WoW ! a new library at a craptastic location that used to be a shopping mall 10 million years ago...Boy oh boy that sounds appealing !



 Posted: Thu Nov 5th, 2009 03:06 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
10th Post
Hartlyboy
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3905
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Paradee has some interesting points about the use of technology to manage the distribution of information in today's world. We have too many people with a self-serving agendas pushing the construction of libraries in our small county.



 Posted: Thu Nov 5th, 2009 12:35 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
11th Post
Gwendolyn Elliott
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 4th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 3
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Interesting how someone who is a member of the County's Library Advisory Committee has always been against the county library.  It seems as though Ms. Elliott always seems to side with the City of Dover.  Why even be a member if you can't even support it?

Mishl, Yes, I am on the Library Advisory Committee of Kent County.  From the bylaws: “The general purpose of the Committee is to study, research, plan and make advisory recommendations regarding the direction of Kent County libraries for the future”.   The focus of the library community is equal access to quality library services.  How are we doing in Kent County?  Let’s get rid of the artificial divide between municipalities and county because first of all, we are all county residents, secondly, over 50% of our three municipal library users are county residents who come from outside the municipalities.   

Since the Kent County Library and Bookmobile are located in central Kent County along with Dover, the question is what is the operating funding for the outlying libraries, Harrington and Smyrna?  Last year Harrington and Smyrna received an average of $45,000 each from the county.   There are no public libraries in the state that receive such poor funding from their county with the closest one receiving $147,000.  While the towns contribute to their libraries the total is still very small (not as much as the Kent County Bookmobile) compared to the $439,800 Kent County Library budget.  

Knowing that Kent County is far from providing equal access to quality library services, what are a majority of our commissioners proposing to do about this?  Is the answer really in putting more money into central Delaware with the expense of another library or does it make economic sense to join Dover and work on increasing operating funding to Harrington and Smyrna?

Levy Court still has time to work on a plan for equal access to quality library services.  I hope they do.



 Posted: Wed Nov 4th, 2009 09:55 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
12th Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

BS, HS and MS..................... Too many tall horses in the game.



 Posted: Wed Nov 4th, 2009 03:39 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
13th Post
mishl
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 25th, 2008
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 116
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

tspong wrote: Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Pertaining to library services in Kent County, Levy Court has two shortcomings: lack of cooperation and lack of long range planning which includes knowledge of state of the art libraries.

Cooperation: I take issue with Mr. Banta’s “divide and conquer” statement in the Delaware State News. Libraries are not about war but are all about consensus, cooperation and sharing. In my 45 years in the library world, I never have encountered the divisiveness that the recent Levy Court actions have wrought through commissioner comments such as “we are not going to be told what to do,” “our” money and “my” library, which does nothing to enhance library services in Kent County. The county library could not function as well without interlibrary loans from the very municipal libraries that served this county before 1999 when the Kent County Library did not exist.

Planning and knowledge: I believe in the greatest good for the greatest number in the cheapest, most efficient way possible. Large libraries are more efficient and cheaper to run than smaller libraries. Therefore as first priority I start with the Dover Library, which has over five times the number of registered borrowers as the Kent Library and has the lowest cost/circulated item. After the Dover Anchor Library is built the next priorities should be supporting the regional libraries in the north and south of the county and seeing how the Kent County Library would fit into this system. It does not make sense for Levy Court to buy a building for a new county library at this time. Where is the library needs assessment? What about the $22,500 annual condo fee at the Longacre site? What about retrofitting a building when Dover, Harrington and Smyrna recognize the need to build libraries as state-of-the-art facilities? Making an important planning decision that affects all libraries in Kent County during a three week period is unconscionable.

What Levy Court should do right now is support the building of a Dover and Kent County Library, which has gone through five years of planning, and plan for a countywide library system which would benefit all libraries in Kent County.

Gwendolyn Elliott

Magnolia


Interesting how someone who is a member of the County's Library Advisory Committee has always been against the country library.  It seems as though Ms. Elliott always seems to side with the City of Dover.  Why even be a member if you can't even support it?



 Posted: Wed Nov 4th, 2009 02:13 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
14th Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Copied below is a guest commentary submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."


 

by Trey Paradee


I would like all of the public officials involved in the ongoing library debate to ask themselves a very simple question: "What is the purpose of building two new public libraries?" If the purpose is to make as much information and resources available to as many people as possible in the most cost-effective way, then we need to abandon the current library proposals and bring in some fresh, forward-thinking ideas.


For those of us who graduated high school or college before the age of the Internet, the old system of card catalogs and library books was the only way for us to obtain information. The proposed libraries will cost upwards of $30 to $40 million and will build upon an outdated model that made sense in the 1940s-1980s. Future generations of taxpayers will be burdened with the cost of heating, cooling, and maintaining these structures. It is completely unnecessary to build a big, comfortable space for people to peruse racks of books.


The Internet has given today’s children virtually unlimited access to information from all over the world. Our tax dollars should be directed more towards developing the technology of the future (computers, Internet) and less on housing the technology of the past (paper). There is a more cost-effective way to put more information in the hands of Kent County residents, which I will attempt to describe.


(1) Consolidate all of the books and print resources of our current City and County libraries into a "Central Warehouse Facility," where they can be bar-coded and entered into a Web-based inventory system. The facility would need to be climate-controlled, but would not require the cost of a public access building. There is plenty of empty warehouse space currently available in Kent County.


(2) Establish six to twelve Community Information and Technology Centers ("CITCs") throughout Kent County. The CITCs could be located in existing retail shopping centers or office complexes where there is ample parking (unlike downtown Dover). Each of these facilities would feature a number of computer workstations. The existing Dover Public Library, once cleared of most of its books, would have more space for more computers — its most in-demand resource.


(3) People who need the print resources would enter an order on the Web-based inventory system through a computer at home, school, senior center, or one of the CITCs.


(4) Each day a small number of modern-day "Bookmobiles" would make the rounds from the Warehouse to the CITCs, schools, and senior centers to deliver the requested materials within 24 hours.


The concept I am describing is not silly, farfetched, or even original. It’s "Just-In-Time" (JIT) inventory management, a concept being used by thousands of successful businesses, large and small.


This concept would (1) potentially save us millions of dollars, (2) eliminate the duplication of services and resources, (3) give us far more flexibility in the future as technology changes and populations shift or grow, and (4) achieve the goal of putting more information and resources into the hands of more Kent County children, seniors, and taxpayers. Isn’t that the point? Why doesn’t the City of Dover save some of this money and space and use it to finally solve the parking, traffic, and economic development problems that have plagued downtown Dover for a quarter century?



 Posted: Tue Nov 3rd, 2009 08:25 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
15th Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

Pertaining to library services in Kent County, Levy Court has two shortcomings: lack of cooperation and lack of long range planning which includes knowledge of state of the art libraries.

Cooperation: I take issue with Mr. Banta’s “divide and conquer” statement in the Delaware State News. Libraries are not about war but are all about consensus, cooperation and sharing. In my 45 years in the library world, I never have encountered the divisiveness that the recent Levy Court actions have wrought through commissioner comments such as “we are not going to be told what to do,” “our” money and “my” library, which does nothing to enhance library services in Kent County. The county library could not function as well without interlibrary loans from the very municipal libraries that served this county before 1999 when the Kent County Library did not exist.

Planning and knowledge: I believe in the greatest good for the greatest number in the cheapest, most efficient way possible. Large libraries are more efficient and cheaper to run than smaller libraries. Therefore as first priority I start with the Dover Library, which has over five times the number of registered borrowers as the Kent Library and has the lowest cost/circulated item. After the Dover Anchor Library is built the next priorities should be supporting the regional libraries in the north and south of the county and seeing how the Kent County Library would fit into this system. It does not make sense for Levy Court to buy a building for a new county library at this time. Where is the library needs assessment? What about the $22,500 annual condo fee at the Longacre site? What about retrofitting a building when Dover, Harrington and Smyrna recognize the need to build libraries as state-of-the-art facilities? Making an important planning decision that affects all libraries in Kent County during a three week period is unconscionable.

What Levy Court should do right now is support the building of a Dover and Kent County Library, which has gone through five years of planning, and plan for a countywide library system which would benefit all libraries in Kent County.

Gwendolyn Elliott

Magnolia



 Posted: Tue Nov 3rd, 2009 02:56 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
16th Post
DelawareNative
Member


Joined: Thu May 10th, 2007
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 287
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Libraries aren't just about books or bookmobiles.  They are a way to help close the digital divide. A big part of the Dover Library presentation is an area in the upstairs for teens.    More things for teens to do would be a good thing. A lot of poor people and out of work people that might not have the money for broadband also use libraries for job searches.  The county library would also be a good place for presentations, meetings, and training, and more.  I am sure that the seniors that end up in the 55+ part of Longacre would take advantage of programs aimed at them. 



 Posted: Thu Oct 29th, 2009 05:43 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
17th Post
mishl
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 25th, 2008
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 116
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

The City of Dover people will still be crying because the County will have a "new" library before they do, regardless of where it ended up.



 Posted: Thu Oct 29th, 2009 05:29 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
18th Post
Hartlyboy
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3905
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Demiglow wrote: Hartlyboy wrote: So the Dover library is too close to one place the County wanted to put theirs and the Felton site is within spittin' distance of Harrington which has a nice set-up. Smyrna covers the northern part of the County.

Hello? Maybe we don't need a County library a'tall. It sounds like we are just spending money because we did it in the past.


I have the Longacre site pegged as 11 miles from the Harrington library and just over 6 miles from the Dover Library.  Felton is 6 miles from Harrington, if you go town center.

The Longacre site will still end up with the county having an overlapping service area with Dover, but not nearly as badly as the present location. 

At this point, there is no sense on debate on whether it's needed, it's too hard to close it down.  The county still needs to define a local service area population and tax them for the extra benefit of having a local library so that county folks who arent nearby aren't overly subsidising it.

 

Demi, not to be argumentive , but why are you guys struggling so hard over whether it's x miles or y miles? Once you are in the car to go to any library, it makes no difference if it's 6 miles or 10. Kent County isn't Texas..you can get anywhere in a short time unless you are walking or driving a buggy. And if you are concerned about the Amish driving their buggies to the libraray, we could provide transportation or mobile bookmobiles a whole lot cheaper than all the silliness we are engaged in now...



 Posted: Thu Oct 29th, 2009 11:37 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
19th Post
Demiglow
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 6th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 39
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Hartlyboy wrote: So the Dover library is too close to one place the County wanted to put theirs and the Felton site is within spittin' distance of Harrington which has a nice set-up. Smyrna covers the northern part of the County.

Hello? Maybe we don't need a County library a'tall. It sounds like we are just spending money because we did it in the past.


I have the Longacre site pegged as 11 miles from the Harrington library and just over 6 miles from the Dover Library.  Felton is 6 miles from Harrington, if you go town center.

The Longacre site will still end up with the county having an overlapping service area with Dover, but not nearly as badly as the present location. 

At this point, there is no sense on debate on whether it's needed, it's too hard to close it down.  The county still needs to define a local service area population and tax them for the extra benefit of having a local library so that county folks who arent nearby aren't overly subsidising it.

 



 Posted: Thu Oct 29th, 2009 03:26 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
20th Post
Hartlyboy
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3905
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

So the Dover library is too close to one place the County wanted to put theirs and the Felton site is within spittin' distance of Harrington which has a nice set-up. Smyrna covers the northern part of the County.

Hello? Maybe we don't need a County library a'tall. It sounds like we are just spending money because we did it in the past.



 Posted: Thu Oct 29th, 2009 02:37 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
21st Post
violetdragonfly
Member


Joined: Sat Sep 1st, 2007
Location: Camden, Delaware USA
Posts: 449
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Mom, I know the point is moot now.  But there are sex offenders everywhere.   There is no place that any council or town can choose that isn't going to have  registered sex offender somewhere nearby.  If you're referring to Brecknock, there are unsupervised children there all the time already, much more on their own than any kid in a library building would be.   All you can do educate your children and keep an eye on them and who they're with.   And keep in mind that not only are kids more at risk from someone in their own family or a close friend than they are from a random person, in spite of the 'stranger danger' motto but you have no way of knowing if a neighbor served time for murder or robbery. 



 Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 04:06 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
22nd Post
libraryfriend
Member
 

Joined: Thu Jul 13th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 15
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

The Harrington Public Library is only 6 miles from Felton.  We are a full service Public Library open to anyone in the area.  Library Cards are free.  We have 8 public access computers with free Internet and access to databases.  We have a public FAX.  We offer a variety of programs - all FREE - for children and adults.  We have a very nice selection of books for children, adults, and teens, magazines, newspapers, audio books, music CDs, and DVDs.  We have a Winter Reading Program and a Summer Reading program for children and adults. Story Time for preschoolers is every Wednesday at 10:45.  Children will enjoy stories, and a craft with Miss Marleena.      If you live in the Felton area, please come in and check us out!  The library is located at 110 E. Center Street.                                                                                            The Hours are:
Monday, Wednesday, Friday 10 - 6,  Tuesday & Thursday 11:30 - 8 and Saturday
10 - 2.  If you would like to receive our E-newsletter send an email to
library@cityofharrington.com and we'll add you to the list.



 Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 04:02 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
23rd Post
DoverDelawarean
Member
 

Joined: Thu Jun 7th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 167
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Longacre Village Shopping Center near Felton.

Are there two? I know about the one north of Woodside almost in Camden. Is there another one in Felton?

Sarcasm



 Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 03:46 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
24th Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Levy Court approves Felton site for library


Kent panel rescinds offer on location at Brecknock Park


By Al Kemp


Delaware State News


DOVER — The Kent County Levy Court changed direction in its search for a new county library site late Tuesday night, voting to rescind its Oct. 13 offer on a site at Brecknock Park in north Camden.


Commissioner George "Jody" Sweeney made a motion to accept an offer from Longacre Village Shopping Center near Felton. The motion passed by a vote of 5-1 with one abstention.


Commissioner Sweeney lamented what he considered uncivil dialogue on the subject.


"The result of five months of hard work has been a considerable amount of harsh words directed at myself," he said.


President P. Brooks Banta said the site-selection process has been muddled by interference from people who don’t wish to work together but rather wish to "divide and conquer."


City managers Anthony De Prima of Dover, David S. Hugg III of Smyrna and John Schatzschneider of Harrington sent Levy Court a letter earlier this week voicing their opposition to the Brecknock Park site because it is too close to the existing Dover library.


The town managers said in their letter they would like to present a plan for county-wide library services in November.


Dog park contract awarded


In other business, the commissioners unanimously voted to award a $7,570 contract to Nanticoke Fence to erect 5-foot-tall enclosure of the Tidbury Creek Dog Park, and also approved the expenditure of more than $10,000 in county funds left over from Big Oak Park.


Commissioner Bradley S. Eaby noted that the Tidbury Dog Park Association has raised some $4,000 for the project.


"The partnership between the county and the private sector speaks volumes about the importance of this project," he said.


Commissioner Eric L. Buckson was equally effusive about the initiative.


"I see this as opening up a new avenue for parks," he said, citing skate parks and BMX parks as examples.


Grooming business OK’d


The commissioners also voted to approve a conditional-use petition for a dog-grooming business in the neighborhood of Highland Acres. Conditions included weekday hours of 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. with no business on weekends.


The Regional Planning Commission sent the application to Levy Court without recommendation after the planners deadlocked 3-3-1 at their Oct. 8 meeting.


At Tuesday’s meeting, applicants Michael and Angela Goodhand, made a detailed case for Levy Court approval, and many of their neighbors vouched for them.


"We don’t do kenneling. We’re not running a doggie day care," Mr. Goodhand said. "We won’t do overnight boarding. We’re not going to have dogs outside. They’re not going to be in the back yard, they’re not going to be barking."


He said there would be no "gaudy" business sign but that he and his wife would probably simply replace the pink flamingo on their mailbox with a picture of a dog and cat.


However, a succession of neighbors also voiced their opposition to the Goodhands’ application. Their concerns included traffic, safety of neighborhood children, property values and the odor of dog manure.


"I don’t know of any dogs that are potty-trained," said Earl Webb, who lives next to the Goodhands.


After hearing the comments, commissioners sided with the Goodhands, voting 6-0 to approve the application, with Commissioner Buckson abstaining.


Hot mix a hot topic


In a motion that generated copious contention among the commissioners and spectators alike, Commissioner Buckson made a motion to modify a controversial application by Stafford Properties to build a hot-mix production facility on 22 acres near Farmington, but with 36 stipulations.


Levy Court had debated the application until past midnight during its Sept. 22 business meeting before voting to table the issue for further study. The issue was lifted from the table Tuesday night, but with 36 stipulations.


Some of the stipulations were placed on the application by the Regional Planning Commission and others were Commissioner Buckson’s, such as requiring the applicant to establish a $100,000 escrow account for site reclamation, plus $10,000 each year.


The motion passed by a 5-2 vote. Representatives for the applicant declined comment as they left the chambers.


Staff writer Al Kemp may be reached at 741-8296 or akemp@newszap.com.



 Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 03:43 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
25th Post
DoverDelawarean
Member
 

Joined: Thu Jun 7th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 167
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

 

Last edited on Wed Oct 28th, 2009 03:50 pm by DoverDelawarean



 Posted: Wed Oct 28th, 2009 11:44 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
26th Post
MomOfThreeinDE
Member
 

Joined: Tue Oct 27th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 2
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

My point on that is... it is so unfortunate that the facilities are not available to this group of kids. They too deserve all the perks other children are given, and level the playing field when it comes to education. Their selection is far from being a "library." In the meantime until a facility is closer to Felton to service the needs of that part of the county, if you stumble across any gently used books that children may read, donate them. (Like many do to the different "friends" groups around.) Reading is truly the backbone to life   :D



 Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 09:48 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
27th Post
Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Cam-Wyo
Posts: 664
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

The final decision WILL be made tonight, so let me make my final points on this issue.  If we decide to stay where we are for the next year or so, at some point we need to decide what the County will do with Library Services.  To avoid the fanatical response from the Dover Library, we will have to move south of Viola.  We need to be 12 miles from Dover to avoid their six mile radius and to establish our own six mile radius.  Commercial buildings of that type do not exist between Viola and Killens Pond Rd, so we have to build.  The cost of a 12,000 square foot library will be $6,000,000 in TODAY's money, requiring a tax increase to fund the library or to fund the Debt Service on a Bond.  Who will agree to that? 

At that location, what happens when Felton wants to build a library?  Will these same Master Plan supporters be there to tell Felton that they cannot open a library in the County Service Area or will they again tell the county to close the library to help Felton. 

The only other option is to remove ourselves from the picture altogether and get out of the library service.  If we do not move, the only loser will be the County residents. 

I appreciate the ability to communicate with those who have kept the conversation civil in these blogs and to provide responses to valid questions.  But this library issue has raised so much hostility in the community that it is time to move on to other subjects.



 Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 09:34 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
28th Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Your point is well taken.  This is how most libraries were formed.  What is wrong with a "COMMUNITY" Library.  Why should the taxpayers fund what the community is already doing on their own?  Who's money do you think you are spending when you spend taxes?

MomOfThreeinDE wrote:
I am all for keeping BOTH libraries open and operational, but I do feel Levy Courts choice of location is ridiculous. Are the constituents aware that the community of Felton has started its own sort of make shift library of books being donated from the community so kids have books to read over the summer for a summer reading program! Should this not be a service that is provided by us as county tax payers?




 Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 09:31 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
29th Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I wouldn't worry as much about the registered sex offenders in an area as I would about the potential offenders.



 Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 08:56 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
30th Post
MomOfThreeinDE
Member
 

Joined: Tue Oct 27th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 2
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I am an avid reader of the blogs, but typically feel as if someone always ends up speaking my mind for me...the "great minds think alike" scenario, well I did, until today.

Most importantly in my life I am a mom. I am active in our schools, and believe that not only do we have to provide libraries to aid in the education for the kids but we also have to make sure they are built where the kids will be safe.

Someone mentioned the safety of the area for the Dover Library site, calling it crime ridden...where?? I go down to the library now in the evening with my children and do not feel scared or threatened.

One thing I do keep an eye on is where the area sex offenders are registered at for their home address, just because why would we want to make it easier on the predators? The potential site of the new DOVER library does not have anyone within 500 feet (which is the required distance from schools) however did the County even consider looking into their neighbors? Nope!
There is a sex offender less than 500 ft from their potential site.
How much thought was put into this site? Did they even stop to think about safety from their own perspective? Yet are so quick to pass judgement on the area near the current library. If we would not allow a sex offender to live within 500 feet of a school why would we want to build a library that provides services for children where a known offender lives??? 

Just for the record I am NOT a constituent of the City of Dover, I AM one of Kent County though! I have visited the Kent County Library ONCE, and realized quickly I would rather battle the poor parking conditions in Dover than settle for what the county has to offer.

I am all for keeping BOTH libraries open and operational, but I do feel Levy Courts choice of location is ridiculous. Are the constituents aware that the community of Felton has started its own sort of make shift library of books being donated from the community so kids have books to read over the summer for a summer reading program! Should this not be a service that is provided by us as county tax payers?

I think for whatever reason there is a big rush going on with the county...they still have many months but they feel they need to jump and move forward so quickly without regard to many things....be careful, this can be dangerous territory.



 Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 03:37 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
31st Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Move south on library, Kent towns tell county


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — The managers of Dover, Smyrna and Harrington have called on Kent County Levy Court to move the county library to Longacre Village in south Camden, rather than to its proposed location several hundred yards outside Dover.


City Manager Anthony J. DePrima informed City Council of the recommendation Monday night. Levy Court may vote tonight on whether to purchase land next to Brecknock Park in north Camden as a library site. That proposed deal has drawn criticism from those who say it would waste money by putting a county library too close to the older, much larger Dover Public Library.


"We are opposed to locations that further overlap existing library service areas, causing a duplication of library services and unnecessary competition for desperately needed resources," states a letter to Levy Court from Mr. DePrima, Smyrna Town Manager David Hugg and Harrington City Manager John Schatzschneider. Mr. DePrima said the letter went out Monday.


Dover, Smyrna and Harrington are the only communities in Kent County to operate municipal libraries. A statewide master plan calls for those communities to serve their vicinities and for Kent County to serve readers south of Dover who live farther than 6 miles from a municipal library.


Mr. DePrima, Mr. Hugg and Mr. Schatzschneider previously expressed their opposition to the Brecknock Park location, but until now had not endorsed a possible alternative. Levy Court commissioners have said they choose the land next to the park because they found no better deal.


But the managers, in their letter, said Longacre Village, located closer to Felton, "will bring library services closer to the people of Kent who are farthest from current library services, and it reduces the current overlap with the Dover library’s service area. In addition, the site has better visibility from (U.S. 13), more parking and better highway access."


The managers went on to say that they would like to present a plan for countywide library services to Levy Court in November.


The county has operated a library in Camden since 1995, but the lease on its library building expires in May. Also at Monday’s council meeting, Margery Cyr, director of Dover Public Library, said detailed plans for a new Dover library should be ready for presentation to council in December. She said the estimated project cost has been reduced from $23.5 million to $22 million.


In other business, council approved without debate proposals to restore a second ambulance crew during the hours from 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. and to eliminate two of the 11 unpaid furlough days city workers were to serve as part of an effort to reduce spending. Both proposals had been unanimously recommended by the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee. They will cost an estimated $136,000.


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.



 Posted: Tue Oct 27th, 2009 02:15 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
32nd Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

An apology is requested


As a resident of Longacre Village, an active adult community located just south of Camden on Route 13, I have been following the Kent County library relocation plan very closely since our shopping center is being considered as one of the proposed locations. On Sunday, October 25th, there was a very interesting article regarding the planned location for the library. Midway through the article there was mention of Longacre Village shopping center as an alternate location for the library because it was further south than the planned location at Brecknock Park and would encompass our neighbors in Felton, Magnolia, etc. Located on Route 13, the Longacre Village shopping center is an ideal location having ample parking with easy access from and to Route 13. But, I take offense to the remark by Commissioner Allen F. Angel which said, "locating in that shopping center not only would be more expensive but would put library users at risk of injury if drinking drivers patronized the center’s liquor store." My interpretation of this comment is the proprietor of Longacre Liquors is irresponsible and would sell liquor to an obviously intoxicated customer who would drive away drunk. It also implies the other businesses in the center do not care about the safety of their customers and that our community is not a safe place to live or walk. I want everyone who read the article to know that this IS NOT TRUE. Longacre Village residents and business owners would not tolerate open drunkenness. We would immediately contact the proper authorities so our community would remain the safe and serene place that we have chosen to call home. I believe Commissioner Angel owes both the business proprietors and homeowners an apology and his comments [should] be stricken from the meeting records.


Carol Dabrowski


Longacre Village homeowner


Dover



 Posted: Mon Oct 26th, 2009 04:09 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
33rd Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

What do you think?

From the Delaware State News:

Kent County library plan questioned


Choice of Brecknock Park location has some calling for project’s delay


By Bruce Pringle


Delaware State News


DOVER — Kent County officials’ tentative agreement to build a library just outside Dover, within a few minutes' drive of where another new library is planned, has sparked complaints that services will continue to be duplicated in the center of the county while the needs of readers farther south remain inadequately met.


But two of the four Levy Court members who voted to develop a county library next to Camden’s Brecknock Park say the controversial decision might have been avoided if Dover’s proposed new public library were planned for a more popular location. Levy Court President P. Brooks Banta and Commissioner George "Jody" Sweeney indicated the creation of a new county library might never have come to a vote Oct. 13 — it passed 4-2 with one abstention — if Dover leaders were not insistent on keeping their library downtown.


Had a location more to their constituents’ liking been chosen, commissioners Banta and Sweeney said, they would have been more inclined to support a merger of the city and county libraries, as proposed in the spring. That merger would have given control of both libraries to an independent commission, which could have operated a single, major facility. Supporters of that concept said it would have been more economical and efficient than continuing to finance two libraries — one city, one county — in the Dover-Camden area.


"People just don’t want to be downtown," said Commissioner Sweeney, who lives in Wyoming. "People I talk to — not just in my district, but throughout the county — don’t want to go downtown for entertainment."


Commissioner Banta, a Smyrna resident, said Dover could have eliminated "some of the complexities that exist" by choosing a location along a major route where the setting would be similar to that of a shopping center.


"It has been expressed to me on numerous occasions that, especially in the months from November to April, people would have concerns about participating at the library" in the proposed location, on East Loockerman Street between City Hall and the Dover post office, Commissioner Banta said. Asked whether he meant people were wary of being downtown after dark, he declined to elaborate.


Dover and state officials say that traffic to the current Dover library, located downtown, proves people are indeed willing to visit. "When they say people don’t want to drive to Dover, well, a lot of them are," said State Librarian Anne E.C. Norman.


Her office credits Dover Public Library with attracting well over 1,000 visits on an average day — roughly half of them by people from outside the city, according to the library.


City police say safety is not a major issue downtown, with relatively little crime occurring there. A greater concern, many downtown business owners insist, is an erroneous perception that downtown is a place where danger lurks. They recently convinced officials to fund security cameras as an assurance to shoppers.


City Manager Anthony J. DePrima said the choice of the city library location followed months of "very open, very participatory" meetings in which area residents from outside Dover may have outnumbered those who live inside. The Loockerman Street site was praised as centrally located and a bargain; it is on city land, sparing Dover from buying or leasing property elsewhere.


Its selection, Mr. DePrima said, "is being used as a red herring."


The major issue in Levy Court’s choice of its own library site, he and others say, is that the county library will be barely outside Dover while greater library needs exist elsewhere. Harrington’s city library is among the smallest in Delaware and neither Felton nor Frederica has a public library.


Levy Court operates a bookmobile and transports books and other materials among the libraries in Dover, Harrington, Smyrna and Milford. It budgeted $640,000 as contributions to those libraries this year, with the distribution of those funds based on circulation. After a similar amount was set aside last year, about $510,000 of that total went to Dover, County Administrator Michael Petit de Mange said.


Levy Court offers a single library of its own, on U.S. 13 north of Del. 10, less than a mile south of where it plans to build a new one. The lease at the current location expires in May. State library officials have urged that any new county library be farther from Dover, perhaps developed in cooperation with Harrington.


"We’ve been saying to Kent County for years, ‘We know you’re going to build. Go south. Work with Harrington," Ms. Norman said. "That’s why everybody’s so up in arms. They didn’t go south. They went north."


Levy Court voted Oct. 13 to make a purchase offer of $1.5 million on a 12,000-square-foot building on Old Camden Road. The acquisition would enable the county to avoid leasing library space. And because only 9,000 square feet would be used as a library, room for county parks-and-recreation personnel would be available if Levy Court decided to move them. No better deal was found south of Dover, Commissioner Sweeney said.


Levy Court could give final approval to the purchase Tuesday.


Among the alternative locations is Longacre Village, which is closer to Felton. But Commissioner Allan F. Angel said locating in that shopping center not only would be more expensive but would put library users at risk of injury if drinking drivers patronized the center’s liquor store.


No joint effort


Meanwhile, City Council is planning to replace 17,000-square-foot Dover Public Library following long-running complaints that the South State Street building is too small and offers too few off-street parking spaces. The council is proceeding with the design of a 46,000-square-foot, state-of-the-art facility, costing an estimated $23.5 million. But the project’s financing during a recession was problematic even before Levy Court declined in June to commit $3.7 million to it.


Levy Court’s decision in June squelched a proposal to combine the city and county library operations into a single "anchor library" at the downtown site. The "anchor" would have been managed by an independent commission.


That arrangement, as outlined by Mr. DePrima and Mr. Petit de Mange, would have reduced library expenses for both governments. But it also would have resulted in the closing of the county library, a possibility that elicited vigorous opposition from Camden residents.


Levy Court commissioners at the time questioned whether the proposed library commission would continue bookmobile service and whether Dover officials are right when they say the city’s Loockerman Street parking lot will be adequate for library users, city workers and City Hall visitors. In addition, commissioners had just spent months drafting a balanced budget and expressed reluctance to take on another major financial obligation.


Some commissioners now say they feel they never had a real voice in how their money would have been spent.


Commissioner Angel, who joined commissioners Sweeney, Banta and Harold K. Brode in voting to make an offer on the land next to Brecknock Park, said he served on Dover’s site selection committee but his suggestions were not heeded.


Commissioner Angel, a Dover resident, said he recommended consideration of properties on U.S. 13 and U.S. 113, including the Blue Hen Corporate Center, as well as the former Bayard Hotel on Loockerman Street.


"I felt like the caboose on the train," he said.


Commissioner Sweeney said a joint city-county library operation would have been feasible if the "anchor" site were close to where the county now plans to build. He said enough land for such a project was available near Brecknock Park between Dover and Wyoming.


But Mr. DePrima said he didn’t recall that suggestion being made during the selection process. And if it had been seriously considered, he said, Dover residents would have demanded to know why their library might be moved so far away.


Delay sought


Mr. DePrima, Harrington City Manager John Schatzschneider and Smyrna Town Manager David Hugg have urged Levy Court to delay purchase the land near Brecknock Park until they and their local library directors develop "a municipal-based strategy for library services in Kent County."


"We are completing our work and believe that we can present our findings to you in November," they said in a letter to Commissioner Banta.


But what some Levy Court members may remember most about the letter is the statement, "We believe it is not necessary to have a county library system that competes with our libraries ..."


Commissioner Angel said he believed the managers want the county’s library program dismantled.


Mr. DePrima, Mr. Schatzschneider and Mr. Hugg, in separate interviews, emphasized that is not the case. "None of us," Mr. Hugg said, "is saying ‘Don’t build a county library’ or ‘Don’t have a county library.’ We’d just like the decision on a location made in a broader context."


Said Mr. DePrima, "Plenty of people between Dover and Harrington and between Dover and Milford have to travel more than 6 miles to a library" while both Dover’s and the county’s proposed new libraries would be within 1.5 miles of his south Dover home. "I can walk to either one. That’s not fair to someone in Felton or Frederica."


‘Their own government’


But the county will have the final say in the issue.


"They’re their own government," said Delaware Secretary of State Jeffrey W. Bullock, who oversees the state Division of Libraries. "They can make their own decisions."


Delaware has a strategic plan for library development that calls for Dover’s proposed library to be the primary service provider in the area where Levy Court intends to build, Secretary Bullock said. That could make Dover more likely to receive state funding for operations there, but he said that he does not want to use that as a threat.


"We’re trying to open communication and have a rational discussion on how to provide the best library service to as many people as possible," Secretary Bullock said. "What we do not like to see is duplicated service."


Staff writer Bruce Pringle can be reached at 741-8233 or bpringle@newszap.com.


Library profiles


Kent County Library, 2319 S. DuPont Highway, Dover. Size: 6,200 square feet. (9,000-square-foot replacement planned.) Annual visits: 50,241. Annual circulation: total 77,035; adult 28,749; children’s 48,286. Public computer terminals: 14.


Dover Public Library, 45 S. State St., Dover. Size: 17,090 square feet. (46,000-square-foot replacement planned.) Annual visits: 396,837. Annual circulation: total 406,439; adult 223,222; children’s 183,217. Public computer terminals: 21.


Harrington Public Library, 110 Center St., Harrington. Size: 2,000 square feet. Annual visits: 37,504. Annual circulation: total 33,788; adult 15,512; children’s 18,276. Public computer terminals: 9.


Milford District Free Library, 11 S.E. Front St., Milford. (Located in Sussex County, but partly funded by Kent County.) Size: 8,600 square feet. Annual visits: 134,443. Annual circulation: total 140,604; adult 78,716; children’s 61,888. Public computer terminals: 14.


Smyrna Public Library, 107 S. Main St., Smyrna. Size: 4,918 square feet. Annual visits: 69,731. Annual circulation: total 38,468; adult 15,266; children’s 23,202. Public computer terminals: 6.


Source: Delaware Division of Libraries
2009 Library Profiles



 Posted: Mon Oct 26th, 2009 02:56 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
34th Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

 

I feel compelled to comment on the controversy concerning the Kent County Library. Of course, I have a biased viewpoint, just as everyone else has. I am a retired Kent County Library Technician, as well as being a retired teacher. So, my feelings are toward the support of an independent Kent County Library.


It appears to me that there are some complete misconceptions, such as the tendency to call the Kent County Library "the Camden Library." This is no more correct than to call the Library of Congress "the District of Columbia Library."


Some people who simply do not understand the whole concept of government have asked why those who do not want a library have to pay for it. This is for the same reason that my taxes pay for maintenance of the road to Big Stone Beach. I do not recall ever going there, nor do I foresee a time when I might. So, why should I pay for it? Because it is an obligation of my government, and I benefit from it as do all other citizens, whether directly or not. It’s the same reason why I pay school taxes, even though my children no longer attend public schools. (Yes, my grandchildren do.)


There are a couple of what I consider deliberate partial misconceptions by some of the politicians who have commented on this issue. The most obvious is the fact that the proposed new Dover library is a colossal mistake. The location could not have been worse if they had planned for that. It is within the downtown and state capitol complex, where parking is already a serious problem. This is where parades and festivals are always held, blocking off the already severely limited access.


The planned views show a huge building taking up almost all of the current parking lot. Yet, there will, by some miraculous intervention, be 185 parking places for the library? I admit I am not an architect or city planner, but I do not see it.


The other major mistake by the critics of the county’s proposal, is failing to grasp the idea that this library, if it ever gets built, will be the Dover Public Library. Even if Kent County helped financially, it would still never be the Dover/Kent County Library.


Opponents of the county keep stressing that the Dover Library gets more patronage than the county does. This is true, but completely irrelevant. The fact remains that there are a lot of patrons who feel the Kent County Library fulfills a need. Why should we abandon them for something which is so grossly inappropriate and will be virtually inaccessible?


Grover W. Johnson


Viola



 Posted: Mon Oct 26th, 2009 02:34 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
35th Post
tspong
Member
 

Joined: Fri Aug 24th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4244
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your opinions by clicking on "Reply."

Step one in any process designed to repair a problem is a proper identification of the problem followed by a goals statement — so you know what you’re after. When applying this logic to the Kent County–City of Dover Library issue, several questions remain unanswered, at least, for me. Do we need a Kent County Library? How many citizens have used the current facility in each of the past five years — that information would be valuable in making this decision. I understand the usage was quite low.

With the information I have access to I decided that a sound course of action would be to have the two organizations, city and county, merge their library needs into a single facility. Given the synergy created only by joining forces, the creation of a substantial savings for both is easily achieved. A friend suggested that the ownership of the facility could be set up like the bridge authorities are all throughout the country. No one entity owns the facility — it is owned and managed by a joint organization of the agencies involved. Not a bad idea, huh? Well, it is also not new. I learned yesterday that a proposal very similar to this was presented and rejected by the county.


Now I’ve gotta ask: what is going on here? There simply has to be some unidentified force(s) at work against this kind of an option. I cannot find any reasons to reject such a solid idea. The only one I heard was that the trip to Dover from Camden is difficult for a library patron. I do not think it is but, more important, is it worth losing the synergistic savings created by merging — I think not!


Hats off to Eric Buckson for his comments. He is not supporting the merged solution — but he is not rejecting it either. So, why then is Alan Angel voting against the Dover joint venture? Not only would it be good for the county; it would be good for the majority of his constituents.


John J. Friedman


Dover



 Posted: Sat Oct 24th, 2009 05:25 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
36th Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

How far do you drive to get to Lowes?  A 20 minute drive is nothing.  The bulk of the population in Kent live within a few miles of Camden.  You said Milford and Harrington were closer.  Use the nice Milford Library that is under expansion or the Harrington Library.

Dover needs much less than they are planning for.



 Posted: Sat Oct 24th, 2009 03:49 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
37th Post
charles
Member
 

Joined: Tue Apr 28th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 24
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Both projects benefit primarily the Dover area.  For me, that's a 20-minute drive.  I can get to Milford or Harrington in half that; Greenwood in 5.  In addition, the Dover project is in excess of their needs (the size is more appropriate for a county library); and with a comprehensive local library system, the county project isn't needed.



 Posted: Fri Oct 23rd, 2009 02:02 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
38th Post
Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Cam-Wyo
Posts: 664
Status: 
Offline

  back to top


This is not an all or nothing approach, putting words in my mouth does not make it seem like I said it.  Plenty of public support does not equate to a majority of public support.  When making this decision, I did not talk to just Dover Library Patrons! How would that have made sense?  That would be like asking Steelers fans if they want their team to repeat!  And I have already debated how our decision is right for County residents. 

The State has not denied funds to the county and we are in compliant, just not with Dover's wishes.  We do not answer to the Dover Library.  Heaven forbid.  The County building would be the size of the DAFB!   

How much money does the Dover Library receive from the State?  Don't include the  $5,000,000 for construction or the $5,000,000 they will ask for next year, just the annual contribution?   

And I hope you don't think that the Library is my cornerstone of reelection.  Being responsive to County residents, getting the answers to their questions, being fiscally responsible, and protecting the assets (open space, parks, general welfare, and safety of the residents) is what I will run on.  The library, Bark Park, expanding Brecknock and others are just an added benefit.



 Posted: Fri Oct 23rd, 2009 12:27 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
39th Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

The issue Margie if you could see beyond your nose, is that those of us in Kent County who are paying he tab don't care to come to your crime ridden, no place to park safely downtown for anything we don't have to.    The other 300 sqare miles don't have the population that the area close to Dover has.  Get over yourself.

MargieCyr wrote:
I need to correct a statement Mr. Sweeney has just printed. I am not and never have been in favor of closing the Kent County Library. I believe it is an essential service to the citizens of Kent County and to their quality of life. At the Levy Court meeting I spoke to this. My request to the Levy Court was that the location of the new Kent County Library be such that it is centrally located within their own service area as defined by the Divsion of Libraries and confirmed by the Council on Libraries rather than being located only 2.6 miles from the Dover Public Library. Should it be located there, it will overlap the service area of the Dover Public Libraray by more than 50%. This would be, in effect, creating two libraries for Dover or Camden or however one speaks of it. This is duplication of services and creates an unnecessary redundancy for which all taxpayers will pay. The Kent County Library has a responsibility to provide services to its service area and not another library's. With more than 300 square miles in Kent County not served by a library, relocating the KC library closer to the center of the unserved area would more properly service the people of Kent County. They deserve that.

Margie Cyr

 



 Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 08:16 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
40th Post
mishl
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 25th, 2008
Location: Dover, Delaware USA
Posts: 116
Status: 
Offline

  back to top



Camden residents need to support this library financially. 
 


They do, through their county taxes, just like you and me.  And for the record (yet again) it is not the "Camden" library.  In fact, the (present) building isn't even within the town limits of Camden.  That side of 13 is a DOVER address.

I don't know what all this arguing is for.  There should be more libraries, not less.  More knowledge, more information -- not less.



 Posted: Thu Oct 22nd, 2009 11:17 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
41st Post
MargieCyr
Member
 

Joined: Mon Aug 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 3
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I need to correct a statement Mr. Sweeney has just printed. I am not and never have been in favor of closing the Kent County Library. I believe it is an essential service to the citizens of Kent County and to their quality of life. At the Levy Court meeting I spoke to this. My request to the Levy Court was that the location of the new Kent County Library be such that it is centrally located within their own service area as defined by the Divsion of Libraries and confirmed by the Council on Libraries rather than being located only 2.6 miles from the Dover Public Library. Should it be located there, it will overlap the service area of the Dover Public Libraray by more than 50%. This would be, in effect, creating two libraries for Dover or Camden or however one speaks of it. This is duplication of services and creates an unnecessary redundancy for which all taxpayers will pay. The Kent County Library has a responsibility to provide services to its service area and not another library's. With more than 300 square miles in Kent County not served by a library, relocating the KC library closer to the center of the unserved area would more properly service the people of Kent County. They deserve that.

Margie Cyr

 



 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 10:49 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
42nd Post
Hartlyboy
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3905
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Demi, you may have the library as one of your hot buttons, but I doubt if Jody or other members of Levy Court are going to kicked out because of they way they see things. The current crop of Commissioners was put in place in response to run-away development and as long as that remains a looming threat, most of us could give a rat's about where or what libraries are built. To most of us in the world outside Dover, the cost of school taxes, infrastructure related taxes and quality of life in general are far greater concerns than where we can borrow a book.

Just sayin.......



 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 09:06 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
43rd Post
Demiglow
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 6th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 39
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Jody.Sweeney wrote: ... ship sailed in May and will NOT be revisited no matter how many times Ms. Cyr, Ms. Elliott, Mr. DePrima, or others say that we should do it their way. 

I never said I would listen to only those who agree with me, I said I would meet with anyone but closing the County Library is not on the table.  Imagine your neighbor telling you that you need to move out of your house.  To negotiate, would you go to the table with them to discuss moving out of your house?  NO!  You would say lets work something out where I can STAY in my house, but still make everyone happy.


 

Sweeney presents this as an all-or-nothing approach, but Dover officals have always realized 2 things : 1. the county was never likely to fork over its fair share to build Kent county's anchor (regional) Library in Dover, and 2, There was plenty of public support to do it anyway.  Just because the county wasn't likely to do the right thing by its residents (who make over 350,000 visits to the Dover Library annually) doesnt mean a request for  it to pay something wasn't worth pursuing.  

I hope the state continues to deny funds to the county until it comes into compliance with the state plan for libraries.   It's not your personal house, Mr Sweeney, it's a library.  You need to stop your magical thinking here and join the the rest of us. 

Camden residents need to support this library financially. Until they do, I would hope your house library gets no more money from the state. That's only fair and that is what all the other libraries in the state do.  Your pet projects don't get to make their own rules. 

We will work out a way where you can stay in your own house at the next election. I think this will go a long way to removing you as an impediment to progress here and should make everyone happy.

 



 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 06:08 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
44th Post
Jody.Sweeney
Member


Joined: Tue Jan 16th, 2007
Location: Cam-Wyo
Posts: 664
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

The reason why the majority of Levy Court Commissioners voted against opening the meeting to public comment was simple.  It was not a Public Meeting.  If we chose to open the meeting on a subject that has already had significant opportunities for public input, from numerous Library Advisory Committee meetings as well as Public Meetings in the Spring, then we would be setting a dangerous precedent on many issues that we face, most which are much more serious than the Library issue.  If you listen to the comments made during the Public Comment at the end of our business meeting, they were all in favor of the county getting out of the Library business and giving all to Dover.  That ship sailed in May and will NOT be revisited no matter how many times Ms. Cyr, Ms. Elliott, Mr. DePrima, or others say that we should do it their way. 

I never said I would listen to only those who agree with me, I said I would meet with anyone but closing the County Library is not on the table.  Imagine your neighbor telling you that you need to move out of your house.  To negotiate, would you go to the table with them to discuss moving out of your house?  NO!  You would say lets work something out where I can STAY in my house, but still make everyone happy.

We are putting the county tax dollar to the best use possible.  Dispute it with facts, not accusations and false statements from a misinformed position.



 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 02:38 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
45th Post
Hartlyboy
Member
 

Joined: Mon Oct 3rd, 2005
Location:  Kenton, Delaware USA
Posts: 3905
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I think there is some misunderstanding about public hearings versus Levy Court business meetings on Planning Commission recomendations. As I recall, the public testimony about a subject that requires Planning Board decisions comes at the Planning Board meeting before those Commissioners and when it gets to Levy Court for a vote on the Board recommendations, all testimony has been heard. Time to speak up is at the Planning Board.

On matters not requiring Planning Board recommendations , you get a hearing at the Levy Court.

I can remember battles against the developers where we had our say at the Planning Board stage but after that you could attend the LC meeting where the final vote was taken but there was not another round of testimony.

Last edited on Wed Oct 21st, 2009 02:39 pm by Hartlyboy



 Posted: Wed Oct 21st, 2009 01:20 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
46th Post
DaisyTooMuch
Member
 

Joined: Tue Oct 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 2
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Hey, Playing the Game, am I to understand that you think this whole thing is a political game? It has nothing to do with people and libraries? If that's true, it is really gross. And the people of Kent County should be outraged. I know I am. Who do Banta, Angel, Sweeney and Brode think they are? These were the commissioners who voted not to allow the people to speak so their opinions could be heard before the commissioners voted on the issue. Perhaps they don't want to hear what the people say. Sweeney keeps saying that he's getting all these calls to support it. But in his latest letter he says he only wants to hear from people who agree with him. So I guess that means that no one else counts. And what about Angel, I just don't get him. He says he's gotten a lot of feedback from county residents. But he was elected to represent the City residents. I gues they don't matter to Angel. Perhaps the City residents wil vote differently next time too.



 Posted: Tue Oct 20th, 2009 09:39 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
47th Post
Playing the Game
Member


Joined: Wed Jan 30th, 2008
Location: Delaware USA
Posts: 5911
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I would continue to demand (Look where Hope has gotten us), that the State keep their noses out of Libraries and where I choose to spend my local tax dollars.

Dover offers nothing to County residents.  There is no parking, no public safety and no reason to come downtown. The State offers another avenue to spend my money on an unnecessary project.  A descent County Library at Breknock Park will neuter the Dover plan and that's what the issue is all about.  This has nothing to do with the taxpayer or the Library user.  It has only to do with the egos of the committee to destroy Dovers taxpayers.

If Dover chooses to move forward with their plan, all well and good.  The County plan is effective for the needs of their taxpayers at a much lower cost than the grandiose plans of the Friends of Old Dover and the hangers on.

Demiglow wrote:
I would hope that state officials take the time to really investigate what the Levy Court is doing here and follow the money before the snowball effect of the county's bad decisions here really starts to add up.   I hate to see my tax money misspent like this on a copycat facility when  cooperative efforts would do everyone so much more good.  

Sweeney and Banta will continue to talk past their counterparts on the state and local levels rather than listening and I  will continue to be embarrased for them.  

 



 Posted: Tue Oct 20th, 2009 08:15 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
48th Post
DoverDelawarean
Member
 

Joined: Thu Jun 7th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 167
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Its time for a referendum, let the voice of the people be heard, not interpreted.

Personally, Dover should just build a new Dover Public Library for its residents only.
Take the money they have set aside from the Civic Center and build the d**n thing already.


As far as the county goes. I could care less about a library outside of Dover in the same way Mr. Sweeney could care less about Dover's library. If his voters want it, then he will either deliver or lose votes. Its simple.

Also on the funding, why are the school districts not chipping in? I know they have their own libraries but it just seems that they would benefit from this as well.

My 2 pesos, continue the bashing...



 Posted: Tue Oct 20th, 2009 08:00 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
49th Post
DaisyTooMuch
Member
 

Joined: Tue Oct 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 2
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

I just don't get it. I think the Levy Court has gone over the edge. There is nothing about their interest in putting a Kent County Library next to Brednock Park that makes sense. What about the rest of us who live farther away? Don't we count? We don't need 2 libraries in Dover and that's what this is. I know who I'm voting for next time!



 Posted: Tue Oct 20th, 2009 07:40 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
50th Post
Demiglow
Member
 

Joined: Wed May 6th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 39
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

Jody.Sweeney wrote: This really is unfortunate.  If the County had started this project first, I seriously doubt that the Friends of the Camden Library would be griping about Dover moving their library .2 miles closer to the County Library. 

It is time to move on to other issues.


No, lets cuss and discuss this some more.   

The argument isn't about whether the county should have libraries, but about where they should best go and whether  present and future locations are a duplication of services.   The Levy Court can put its head in the sand about this all it wants, but until it is willing to play along with the state and local cities here, it will not be providing the best service it can to county citizens. They need to take a step back and see where they went wrong here rather than continuing down this road of redundant services and mismanagement of scarce financial resources.

At the very least, the Levy Court has to recognize the other libraries in the county and not act as if the Camden Library were being planned in isolation from its sister libraries in the county. 

(I do really wish that each time this comes up that the poor staff at the Camden library werent being told that it was either do things your way or be closed down and lose their jobs. They deserve better.)

The fact is that Dover did have its library project first and it has gone through all the proper machinations to come up with what it has, no matter that you or I may not be perfectly happy with the result.  

Had the Camden Library not been miscast as a County Library, and been set up as what it (mostly) is, as a community library, there would be more support for it.  It clearly has a following in the Dover area.

Had the Levy Court seriously considered a Library District, we wouldnt be arguing this - there would be an Anchor library (Dover) and smaller community-based libraries (Camden, Smyrna and Harrington) in the Library District.  This is still likely to be the outcome, though we may have to wait an election cycle or two for this to happen.   



 Current time is 06:55 amPage:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page  
> Delaware Public Forums > Dover Public Issues Forum > Library Merger Mulled -- Proposal gets mixed reaction from crowd
Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 1.4336 seconds (81% database + 19% PHP). 36 queries executed.