| Posted: Wed Jan 6th, 2010 12:44 pm |
|
1st Post |
Prophet of Doom
Member
| Joined: | Sat Nov 19th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 283 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Mendavor wrote: no one else wrote: Mendavor wrote: Bixby, my main antagonist. Socialism is not an evil that can be dismissed with patriotic nonsensical cliches. It is a form of salvation even to the very local issues reflected in this and other small town forums. Take land, for instance. You have so many problems regarding land and housing here due to a lack of a central planning system such as is proposed under socialism. Land should not be kept in the hands of individuals but to the community as a collective. This would prevent certain over development by greedy landowners, developers, and builders. It is the property of all the people and that is why one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto decries private land ownership. If our system were on place you would not have all of this calumny against homes being built. It is yet not under consideration by the local Democratic party leadership but it is certainly in the thoughts of our national leadership. Given the time all things will improve when the control of local party leadership comes into line with the national agenda. Unfortunately for you our Constitution demands something different. Obama was right when he lamented that to him (and the rest of the far-left socialist Democrats, progressives, and outright communists) the Constitution is a "document of negative limitations." Well, yes. It was meant to prevent the abuses of government. Speaking of home building, under the communist system communes were constructed, and poorly at that, to house Soviet citizens in concentrated areas so as not to "ruin the environment." It IS a document of negative limitations and the evidence is apparent when you see the woes and tribulations of the local Smyrna government. This is repeated often, time and time again. I again reiterate my call for unification of progressives within the Democrat party to intensify their efforts and a total change of government to replace the ineffective form now performing poorly. A strong, centralized, socialist soviet-style government is necessary to carry out the will of the people. More involvement in citizen committees would be most helpful but that is not allowed in this ineffective government now in operation. Get in line with the national governmen because without such grass-roots cooperation, change can not occur.
Local Democrats will not respond to the vituperations of the ever-leftward Mendavor because they do fear the taint of the "new socialism" as pandered by the Obama administration's ship of fools piloted by the writings of Marx, Lenin, Thomas, Alinsky and all the radical progressives. Although they may not agree in total with the new left, they want to retain their control at any cost and therein lay the downfall of the once great republic of America. We are all doomed!
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 5th, 2010 12:54 pm |
|
2nd Post |
Someone
Member
| Joined: | Thu Dec 29th, 2005 |
| Location: | Big Cave |
| Posts: | 2181 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
I think I know who the Crack dealer is.
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 5th, 2010 12:42 pm |
|
3rd Post |
Mendavor
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jan 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 640 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
no one else wrote: Mendavor wrote: Bixby, my main antagonist. Socialism is not an evil that can be dismissed with patriotic nonsensical cliches. It is a form of salvation even to the very local issues reflected in this and other small town forums. Take land, for instance. You have so many problems regarding land and housing here due to a lack of a central planning system such as is proposed under socialism. Land should not be kept in the hands of individuals but to the community as a collective. This would prevent certain over development by greedy landowners, developers, and builders. It is the property of all the people and that is why one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto decries private land ownership. If our system were on place you would not have all of this calumny against homes being built. It is yet not under consideration by the local Democratic party leadership but it is certainly in the thoughts of our national leadership. Given the time all things will improve when the control of local party leadership comes into line with the national agenda. Unfortunately for you our Constitution demands something different. Obama was right when he lamented that to him (and the rest of the far-left socialist Democrats, progressives, and outright communists) the Constitution is a "document of negative limitations." Well, yes. It was meant to prevent the abuses of government. Speaking of home building, under the communist system communes were constructed, and poorly at that, to house Soviet citizens in concentrated areas so as not to "ruin the environment." It IS a document of negative limitations and the evidence is apparent when you see the woes and tribulations of the local Smyrna government. This is repeated often, time and time again. I again reiterate my call for unification of progressives within the Democrat party to intensify their efforts and a total change of government to replace the ineffective form now performing poorly. A strong, centralized, socialist soviet-style government is necessary to carry out the will of the people. More involvement in citizen committees would be most helpful but that is not allowed in this ineffective government now in operation. Get in line with the national governmen because without such grass-roots cooperation, change can not occur.
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 18th, 2009 12:35 pm |
|
4th Post |
no one else
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 606 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Mendavor wrote: Bixby, my main antagonist. Socialism is not an evil that can be dismissed with patriotic nonsensical cliches. It is a form of salvation even to the very local issues reflected in this and other small town forums. Take land, for instance. You have so many problems regarding land and housing here due to a lack of a central planning system such as is proposed under socialism. Land should not be kept in the hands of individuals but to the community as a collective. This would prevent certain over development by greedy landowners, developers, and builders. It is the property of all the people and that is why one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto decries private land ownership. If our system were on place you would not have all of this clumny against homes being built. It is yet not under consideration by the local Democratic party leadership but it is certainly in the thoughts of our national leadership. Given the time all things will improve when the control of local party leadeship comes into line with the national agenda. Unfortunately for you our Constitution demands something different. Obama was right when he lamented that to him (and the rest of the far-left socialist Democrats, progressives, and outright communists) the Constitution is a "document of negative limitations." Well, yes. It was meant to prevent the abuses of government. Speaking of home building, under the communist system communes were constructed, and poorly at that, to house Soviet citizens in concentrated areas so as not to "ruin the environment."
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 04:21 pm |
|
5th Post |
Mendavor
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jan 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 640 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Bixby, my main antagonist. Socialism is not an evil that can be dismissed with patriotic nonsensical cliches. It is a form of salvation even to the very local issues reflected in this and other small town forums. Take land, for instance. You have so many problems regarding land and housing here due to a lack of a central planning system such as is proposed under socialism. Land should not be kept in the hands of individuals but to the community as a collective. This would prevent certain over development by greedy landowners, developers, and builders. It is the property of all the people and that is why one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto decries private land ownership. If our system were on place you would not have all of this clumny against homes being built. It is yet not under consideration by the local Democratic party leadership but it is certainly in the thoughts of our national leadership. Given the time all things will improve when the control of local party leadeship comes into line with the national agenda.
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 7th, 2009 12:19 pm |
|
6th Post |
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2520 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Excellent article. I'm glad to see that there are a few who understand the Mendavor mentality and the agenda set by the socialist Democrats, in particular the Obama administration with his collection of communists and leftist radicals in place as a shadow government. We learn that Mendavor should not be taken so lightly since he unabashedly broadcasts the agenda with shocking accuracy.
cottoncandy wrote: Nov. 24, 2009 U.S.S.A. By Cal Thomas
Not all revolutions begin in the streets with tanks and guns. Some advance slowly, almost imperceptibly, until a nation is transformed and the public realizes too late that their freedoms are gone.
Such is the revolution now taking place in America. The '60s crowd has emerged from the ideological grave and is about to impose on this country a declaration of dependence in the form of government-run health insurance and treatment. It matters not what facts are known about this "coup," because to those from the '60s - whether they lived in that decade or were born later and adopted its ideology - only feelings and intentions matter, not truth and results.
Why would anyone trust government - which has a difficult enough time winning wars - to properly administer health care? What track record does government have in living up to its economic forecasts and competence in running anything?
But this is about none of that. This is about liberal Democrats realizing their decades-old dream of complete control of our lives. Every move you make, every breath you take, they'll be watching you. Except, of course, when it comes to terrorists who want to destroy America faster than the liberals do. A different standard is applied to them.
Nowhere in the debate over health care "reform" have we heard a single word from liberal Democrats about personal responsibility, self-reliance and freedom. In fact, the message has come through quite clearly that government will penalize anyone who demonstrates such beliefs, as it attempts to spread your wealth around.
This is how I see health care reform working: If you are a doctor who has spent a lot of money and time becoming a responsible and caring physician, the government will tell you how much to charge your patients and, in fact, whether you will be allowed to treat them at all. Bureaucrats, having given themselves the power of G-d, will decide whether a patient is worth the cost of treatment, thereby deciding who lives and who dies. Despite the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, somewhere down the line taxpayers will be forced to underwrite abortions in violation of the consciences and faith of the majority.
This is the triumph of the humanistic, atheistic worldview. We are all to be regarded as products of evolution in which the fit and the powerful will decide our survival and worth.
When Republicans were in the majority, deficits mattered to Democrats. Now we see that expressed concern was a sham, because if deficits meant something when they were relatively small, they ought to mean something more when we are in hock up to the necks of our Chinese-made clothes.
We've only just begun with this. The new breast and ovarian cancer screening guidelines may soon become mandatory as health care rationing kicks in. The unwanted, the inconvenient and the "burdensome" could soon be dispatched with a pill, or through neglect.
Great horrors don't begin in gas chambers, killing fields, or forced famines. They begin when there is a philosophical shift in a nation's leadership about the value of human life. Novelist Walker Percy examined the underlying philosophy that led to the Holocaust and wrote: "In a word, certain consequences, perhaps unforeseen, follow upon the acceptance of the principle of the destruction of human life for what may appear to be the most admirable social reasons."
In our day, the consequences of government seizure of one-sixth of our economy and government's ability to decide how we run our lives (it won't stop with health care) are foreseen. They are just being ignored in our continued pursuit of personal peace, affluence and political power.
Opinion polls show a majority of Americans reject this health care "reform" bill. They think haste may waste them in the end. It doesn't matter. Like members of a cult, whatever the leader says, goes. The facts be d**ned. The crowd from the '60s will "seize the time," in the words of Black Panther radical Bobby Seale, thus sealing our doom as a unique and wonderful nation.
Welcome to the U.S.S.A., the United Socialist States of America.
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 7th, 2009 01:33 am |
|
7th Post |
cottoncandy
Member
| Joined: | Fri Jun 15th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 304 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Nov. 24, 2009 U.S.S.A. By Cal Thomas
Not all revolutions begin in the streets with tanks and guns. Some advance slowly, almost imperceptibly, until a nation is transformed and the public realizes too late that their freedoms are gone.
Such is the revolution now taking place in America. The '60s crowd has emerged from the ideological grave and is about to impose on this country a declaration of dependence in the form of government-run health insurance and treatment. It matters not what facts are known about this "coup," because to those from the '60s - whether they lived in that decade or were born later and adopted its ideology - only feelings and intentions matter, not truth and results.
Why would anyone trust government - which has a difficult enough time winning wars - to properly administer health care? What track record does government have in living up to its economic forecasts and competence in running anything?
But this is about none of that. This is about liberal Democrats realizing their decades-old dream of complete control of our lives. Every move you make, every breath you take, they'll be watching you. Except, of course, when it comes to terrorists who want to destroy America faster than the liberals do. A different standard is applied to them.
Nowhere in the debate over health care "reform" have we heard a single word from liberal Democrats about personal responsibility, self-reliance and freedom. In fact, the message has come through quite clearly that government will penalize anyone who demonstrates such beliefs, as it attempts to spread your wealth around.
This is how I see health care reform working: If you are a doctor who has spent a lot of money and time becoming a responsible and caring physician, the government will tell you how much to charge your patients and, in fact, whether you will be allowed to treat them at all. Bureaucrats, having given themselves the power of G-d, will decide whether a patient is worth the cost of treatment, thereby deciding who lives and who dies. Despite the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, somewhere down the line taxpayers will be forced to underwrite abortions in violation of the consciences and faith of the majority.
This is the triumph of the humanistic, atheistic worldview. We are all to be regarded as products of evolution in which the fit and the powerful will decide our survival and worth.
When Republicans were in the majority, deficits mattered to Democrats. Now we see that expressed concern was a sham, because if deficits meant something when they were relatively small, they ought to mean something more when we are in hock up to the necks of our Chinese-made clothes.
We've only just begun with this. The new breast and ovarian cancer screening guidelines may soon become mandatory as health care rationing kicks in. The unwanted, the inconvenient and the "burdensome" could soon be dispatched with a pill, or through neglect.
Great horrors don't begin in gas chambers, killing fields, or forced famines. They begin when there is a philosophical shift in a nation's leadership about the value of human life. Novelist Walker Percy examined the underlying philosophy that led to the Holocaust and wrote: "In a word, certain consequences, perhaps unforeseen, follow upon the acceptance of the principle of the destruction of human life for what may appear to be the most admirable social reasons."
In our day, the consequences of government seizure of one-sixth of our economy and government's ability to decide how we run our lives (it won't stop with health care) are foreseen. They are just being ignored in our continued pursuit of personal peace, affluence and political power.
Opinion polls show a majority of Americans reject this health care "reform" bill. They think haste may waste them in the end. It doesn't matter. Like members of a cult, whatever the leader says, goes. The facts be d**ned. The crowd from the '60s will "seize the time," in the words of Black Panther radical Bobby Seale, thus sealing our doom as a unique and wonderful nation.
Welcome to the U.S.S.A., the United Socialist States of America.
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 08:15 pm |
|
8th Post |
Boo
Member
| Joined: | Sat Nov 19th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 592 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
I'd sure like to see some of the Democrat committee people here or one of them elected officials respond to this stuff and clear up a few things. So how come the Democratic party is full of them red or pinko types? Aint no one here gonna protest it?
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 12:10 pm |
|
9th Post |
Zymergy
Member
back to top
|
Mendavor wrote: Zymergy wrote: Can't we keep the non-local political babble to the State Forum? No, we can't. You don't seem to realize that in order to keep the NDC in power, we must rely on those at the common or grass roots level. Without those movements of the people we can't complete the transformation of America as our President desires. If we keep on electing the local Democrats, we in turn elect or keep those up the chain in power. Break the links and the top falls. This is how a revolution is accomplished. That's why I exhort you at the local level to recruit social minded people, fund the local and national, and participate in spreading information around.
Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution. Karl Marx
Ummm......ok
Attachment: maxine5.jpg (Downloaded 70 times)
|
Mendavor
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jan 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 640 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Zymergy wrote: Can't we keep the non-local political babble to the State Forum? No, we can't. You don't seem to realize that in order to keep the NDC in power, we must rely on those at the common or grass roots level. Without those movements of the people we can't complete the transformation of America as our President desires. If we keep on electing the local Democrats, we in turn elect or keep those up the chain in power. Break the links and the top falls. This is how a revolution is accomplished. That's why I exhort you at the local level to recruit social minded people, fund the local and national, and participate in spreading information around.
Communism is the riddle of history solved, and it knows itself to be this solution. Karl Marx
|
Zymergy
Member
back to top
|
Can't we keep the non-local political babble to the State Forum?
|
Mendavor
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jan 8th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 640 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
All of us who are concerned with social welfare must unite to bring about more effective government to nudge us toward a more perfect society. Right now the nation's and the world's plans for social equality are under attack by those of the conservative persuasion in their latest escapades to prevent socialism from gaining complete control over our nation's destiny. They are doing this by promoting the exposure of climate scientists who have been gathering evidence of man-caused global warming by the excess's of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere thereby causing catastrophic climate change. It does not matter how the data was obtained and promoted but what does matter is the purpose of legislation such as cap and trade and cooperation with other socialist nations by means of the new treaty to be signed in Copenhagen by President Obama.
The importance of "green" legislation and treaty passage cannot be overstated. It will help in the creation of green jobs, clean the air, increase the standard of living in poorer areas in America and the world's poorer nations, and provide more effective government administration. It will transfer the wealth of the greedy into the hands of those who are rightfully deserving. It will help pay for the health care reform which is the right of the downtrodden masses who will then enjoy the things once reserved for the rich.
Contact your Democratic elected officials and urge them to pass this important legislation. Better yet, join the Democratic Party and participate the transformation of America towards a more perfect union.
|
|
