| Posted: Wed Mar 17th, 2010 12:05 pm |
|
1st Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Newshound wrote: 3 Mar 10 - (Excerpts) - Al Gore is at it again, ranting and raving in the pages of The New York Times.
Despite winters of increasing severity and the recent disclosures of outright trickery by the avatars of the global warming religion, the former vice president continues to preach sermons of gloom and doom, shrieking warnings that the planet is about to be roasted like a pig on a spit, thanks to the evil ways of mankind.
It's hard to blame him: He's simply found the path to enormous riches — hundreds of millions of dollars in payment for his role as the pied piper of climate change. In all modesty, as far back as 1997, when I wrote my series "Behold the Iceman Cometh," I sought to warn that Gore was embarking on a crusade to persuade the world that the Earth was in the process of self-immolation and it was all your fault and mine.
However, he’s blaming the wrong culprit. Atmospheric CO2 has increased because, as Robert Felix of iceagenow.com has demonstrated, an excess of volcanic activity in the world’s oceans is heating those oceans, which releases CO2.
Wrote Felix: "I think underwater volcanic activity is thousands of times more prevalent than now believed.
"As I say in ‘Not by Fire but by Ice,’ those underwater volcanoes are pumping red-hot lava — 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit hot — into the seas and heating them. That's ten times the boiling point! (See the chapter entitled ‘Fish Stew.’)
"In turn, the warmer seas pump ever more moisture [and CO2] into the skies, which inevitably results in ever more precipitation. When that precipitation falls in the winter, you have the makings of an ice age. I think we're seeing that happen right now. It's not global warming, it's ocean warming, and it's leading us into the next ice age."
Back in the ’70s, there was universal agreement that we were approaching the onset of a new ice age.
According to "Understanding Climate Change,” which the National Academy of Sciences published in 1975, (page 181), "The present interglacial interval — which has now lasted for about 10,000 years — represents a climatic regime that is relatively rare during the past million years, most of which has been occupied by colder, glacial regimes. Only during about 8 percent of the past 700,000 years has the earth experienced climates as warm or warmer than the present.
"The penultimate interglacial age began about 125,000 years ago, and lasted for approximately 10,000 years. Similar interglacial ages — each lasting 10,000 plus or minus 2000 years and each followed by a glacial maximum — have occurred on the average every 100,000 years during at least the past half-million years.
“During this period, fluctuations of the northern hemisphere ice sheets caused sea level variations of the order of 100 meters."
"Few paleoclimatologists would dispute that the prominent warm periods (or interglacials) that have followed each of the terminations of the major glaciations have had durations of 10,000 plus or minus 2000 years. In each case, a period of considerably colder climate has followed immediately after the interglacial interval."
Nothing has changed since that report was issued — it has never been refuted. Yet the academy enthusiastically embraced Gore's global warming theory without blinking an eye — and jumped on the multibillion-dollar global warming express.
There is not a single shred of evidence that global warming is under way. The whole scam is based on temperature readings taken from sensors around the world in locations that became immediately suspect as a result of the emergence of the climategate scandal, in which facts and figures routinely were manipulated to show global warming was a real threat.
Global warming is a scam that has made Al Gore filthy rich, created government rules and regulations that can strangle our fragile economy and cause greater unemployment. It is nothing short of criminal.
Phil Brennan writes for newsmax.com. He is editor and publisher of Wednesday on the Web (http://WWW.pvbr.Com) and was Washington columnist (Cato) for National Review magazine in the 1960s. He is a trustee of the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a member of the Association for Intelligence Officers. He can be reached at pvb@pvbr.com.
See entire article on Phil Brennan's website:http://www.pvbr.com/Issue_1/pers.htm
Thanks to Phil Brennan for this link You can also see the entire article on Newsmax:
http://newsmax.com/brennan/globalwarming-cooling-iceage-AlGore/2010/03/03/id/351497
It's hyperdimensional physics at work. That's why the planet is changing. It's the only reason. In fact the entire argument is premised upon the fact that the average joe is clueless enough to remain within a political scope of irrelevant discussion in regard to the matter. I can't believe it's gone on this long to be completely honest about it.
I will say though that when this suppression of information in regard to the disinformation of this particular issue first started, one who knew what they were looking for would only get 2 results from a typical google search in regard to the subject of the phenomenon but as the cat is slowly let out of the bag, the same search when placed into the context of global warming now yields around 1400 results.
Last edited on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 12:19 pm by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 16th, 2010 10:38 pm |
|
2nd Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Cobra wrote: Lavitakus wrote: People just don't get it. They bite the worm every time.
If China wants it to snow, it's going to snow. If they want it to be 100 degrees, it's going to be a hundred degrees. Just like a few other countries with the technology to do so and a vested interest. So this means that you believe that George Bush caused Hurricane Katrina with the Haliburton weather machine. I hope that you use a chin strap for the spaghetti strainer you wear on your head. We don't want it to fall off and hurt some bystander.
What it means is that if China wants it to snow, it's going to snow. If they want it to be 100 degrees, it's going to be 100 degrees. That's how energy is understood these days, dolt.
Last edited on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 12:00 pm by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 16th, 2010 10:03 pm |
|
3rd Post |
Cobra
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 24th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 565 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Lavitakus wrote: People just don't get it. They bite the worm every time.
If China wants it to snow, it's going to snow. If they want it to be 100 degrees, it's going to be a hundred degrees. Just like a few other countries with the technology to do so and a vested interest. So this means that you believe that George Bush caused Hurricane Katrina with the Haliburton weather machine. I hope that you use a chin strap for the spaghetti strainer you wear on your head. We don't want it to fall off and hurt some bystander.
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 16th, 2010 01:28 pm |
|
4th Post |
| Posted: Thu Mar 11th, 2010 01:44 am |
|
5th Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
People just don't get it. They bite the worm every time.
If China wants it to snow, it's going to snow. If they want it to be 100 degrees, it's going to be a hundred degrees. Just like a few other countries with the technology to do so and a vested interest.
Last edited on Thu Mar 11th, 2010 01:49 am by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 10th, 2010 12:41 pm |
|
6th Post |
| Posted: Sun Mar 7th, 2010 11:16 pm |
|
7th Post |
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2799 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Newshound wrote: Thomas Jefferson Noted Global Warming Climate change crusaders insist that the earth is warming largely due to the emission of greenhouse gases by motor vehicles and factories.
But Thomas Jefferson wrote about global warming back in the early 19th century, before there were any emissions from cars, coal-fired power plants, and other developments of the Industrial Age.
In a letter to Philadelphia physician and professor Nathaniel Chapman dated Dec. 11, 1809, nine months after he left the presidency, Jefferson wrote: “The change which has taken place in our climate is one of those facts which all men of years are sensible of and yet none can prove by regular evidence. They can only appeal to each other’s general observation for the fact.
“I remember that when I was a small boy, say sixty years ago, snows were frequent and deep in every winter, to my knee very often, to my waist sometimes, and that they covered the earth long. And I remember while yet young to have heard from very old men that in their youth the winters had been still colder, with deeper and longer snows. In the year 1772, thirty-seven years ago, we had a snow two feet deep in the Champain parts of this state, and three feet in the counties next below the mountains . . .
“While I lived at Washington, I kept a Diary, and by recurring to that I observe that from the winter of 1802-03 to that of 1808-09 inclusive, the average fall of snow of the seven winters was only 14½ inches, and that the ground was covered but sixteen days in each winter on average of the whole. The maximum in any one winter during that period was 21 inches fall, and 34 days on the ground, the minimum was 4½ inches fall and two days on the ground . . .
“Williams in his history of Vermont has an essay on the change in the climate of Europe, Asia and Africa.”
It’s clear, then, that the earth was warming during Jefferson’s time. It’s also clear that the climate change could not be attributed to man’s activities.
Editor's Note: The Global Warming Myth Exposed
Since most our politicians and America sellouts, don't remember anything about our founding fathers, This will fall on deaf ears. The only ones that will agree/believe are already aware that YES climate does change.
To the so-called believers this climate stuff is their religion like back in Mayan times and Egyptian- 'worship"of the sun "gods" and sacrificing of human and animals to "please" them.
I find it fascinating that a weatherman cannot predict the weather 100% accurately for 10 DAYS, but algore and the other (who have vested interests) are trying to tell us they know what will happen in 50 YEARS. LOL.
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 7th, 2010 08:39 pm |
|
8th Post |
Newshound
Member
| Joined: | Fri Dec 23rd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1317 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Thomas Jefferson Noted Global Warming Climate change crusaders insist that the earth is warming largely due to the emission of greenhouse gases by motor vehicles and factories.
But Thomas Jefferson wrote about global warming back in the early 19th century, before there were any emissions from cars, coal-fired power plants, and other developments of the Industrial Age.
In a letter to Philadelphia physician and professor Nathaniel Chapman dated Dec. 11, 1809, nine months after he left the presidency, Jefferson wrote: “The change which has taken place in our climate is one of those facts which all men of years are sensible of and yet none can prove by regular evidence. They can only appeal to each other’s general observation for the fact.
“I remember that when I was a small boy, say sixty years ago, snows were frequent and deep in every winter, to my knee very often, to my waist sometimes, and that they covered the earth long. And I remember while yet young to have heard from very old men that in their youth the winters had been still colder, with deeper and longer snows. In the year 1772, thirty-seven years ago, we had a snow two feet deep in the Champain parts of this state, and three feet in the counties next below the mountains . . .
“While I lived at Washington, I kept a Diary, and by recurring to that I observe that from the winter of 1802-03 to that of 1808-09 inclusive, the average fall of snow of the seven winters was only 14½ inches, and that the ground was covered but sixteen days in each winter on average of the whole. The maximum in any one winter during that period was 21 inches fall, and 34 days on the ground, the minimum was 4½ inches fall and two days on the ground . . .
“Williams in his history of Vermont has an essay on the change in the climate of Europe, Asia and Africa.”
It’s clear, then, that the earth was warming during Jefferson’s time. It’s also clear that the climate change could not be attributed to man’s activities.
Editor's Note: The Global Warming Myth Exposed
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 5th, 2010 01:07 pm |
|
9th Post |
Newshound
Member
| Joined: | Fri Dec 23rd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1317 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
3 Mar 10 - (Excerpts) - Al Gore is at it again, ranting and raving in the pages of The New York Times.
Despite winters of increasing severity and the recent disclosures of outright trickery by the avatars of the global warming religion, the former vice president continues to preach sermons of gloom and doom, shrieking warnings that the planet is about to be roasted like a pig on a spit, thanks to the evil ways of mankind.
It's hard to blame him: He's simply found the path to enormous riches — hundreds of millions of dollars in payment for his role as the pied piper of climate change. In all modesty, as far back as 1997, when I wrote my series "Behold the Iceman Cometh," I sought to warn that Gore was embarking on a crusade to persuade the world that the Earth was in the process of self-immolation and it was all your fault and mine.
However, he’s blaming the wrong culprit. Atmospheric CO2 has increased because, as Robert Felix of iceagenow.com has demonstrated, an excess of volcanic activity in the world’s oceans is heating those oceans, which releases CO2.
Wrote Felix: "I think underwater volcanic activity is thousands of times more prevalent than now believed.
"As I say in ‘Not by Fire but by Ice,’ those underwater volcanoes are pumping red-hot lava — 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit hot — into the seas and heating them. That's ten times the boiling point! (See the chapter entitled ‘Fish Stew.’)
"In turn, the warmer seas pump ever more moisture [and CO2] into the skies, which inevitably results in ever more precipitation. When that precipitation falls in the winter, you have the makings of an ice age. I think we're seeing that happen right now. It's not global warming, it's ocean warming, and it's leading us into the next ice age."
Back in the ’70s, there was universal agreement that we were approaching the onset of a new ice age.
According to "Understanding Climate Change,” which the National Academy of Sciences published in 1975, (page 181), "The present interglacial interval — which has now lasted for about 10,000 years — represents a climatic regime that is relatively rare during the past million years, most of which has been occupied by colder, glacial regimes. Only during about 8 percent of the past 700,000 years has the earth experienced climates as warm or warmer than the present.
"The penultimate interglacial age began about 125,000 years ago, and lasted for approximately 10,000 years. Similar interglacial ages — each lasting 10,000 plus or minus 2000 years and each followed by a glacial maximum — have occurred on the average every 100,000 years during at least the past half-million years.
“During this period, fluctuations of the northern hemisphere ice sheets caused sea level variations of the order of 100 meters."
"Few paleoclimatologists would dispute that the prominent warm periods (or interglacials) that have followed each of the terminations of the major glaciations have had durations of 10,000 plus or minus 2000 years. In each case, a period of considerably colder climate has followed immediately after the interglacial interval."
Nothing has changed since that report was issued — it has never been refuted. Yet the academy enthusiastically embraced Gore's global warming theory without blinking an eye — and jumped on the multibillion-dollar global warming express.
There is not a single shred of evidence that global warming is under way. The whole scam is based on temperature readings taken from sensors around the world in locations that became immediately suspect as a result of the emergence of the climategate scandal, in which facts and figures routinely were manipulated to show global warming was a real threat.
Global warming is a scam that has made Al Gore filthy rich, created government rules and regulations that can strangle our fragile economy and cause greater unemployment. It is nothing short of criminal.
Phil Brennan writes for newsmax.com. He is editor and publisher of Wednesday on the Web (http://WWW.pvbr.Com) and was Washington columnist (Cato) for National Review magazine in the 1960s. He is a trustee of the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a member of the Association for Intelligence Officers. He can be reached at pvb@pvbr.com.
See entire article on Phil Brennan's website:http://www.pvbr.com/Issue_1/pers.htm
Thanks to Phil Brennan for this link You can also see the entire article on Newsmax:
http://newsmax.com/brennan/globalwarming-cooling-iceage-AlGore/2010/03/03/id/351497
|
The Insyder
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 915 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
DUCT TAPE ALERT!
It's the news of the day that will just make your head explode: Lindsey Graham's latest view on Cap and Trade, Obama's latest healthcare flip, and the latest luxury item government wants to give away for free. WARNING: Do NOT listen to or read this segment without first applying duct tape - your head will explode. Transcript
|
The Insyder
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 915 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Senator Graham hearts Cap & Trade
It seems incomprehensible that the same state to bring America solid conservative Jim DeMint would be the same state to bring us Lindsey Graham. He's one of those progressive republicans that Glenn loves so much, and Graham didn't help himself by making a John-Kerry-esque statement on Cap and Trade this week. Glenn reacts to Senator Grahmesty on radio this morning. Transcript
Whew! Gore found safe and sound...
America breathed a collective sigh of relief this week as former Vice President Al Gore was found safe as a polar bear on ice, turning up in the New York Times where he was writing in response to the mounting fabricated data coming from the alarmist community. Is Gore backing down? Stu explains in his latest Blog: Gore Returns to Warm your Heart.
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 28th, 2010 08:08 pm |
|
12th Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Newshound wrote: St. Louis-based Peabody had sales of 244 million tons of coal last year. Its coal products fuel 10 percent of all U.S. electricity generation and 2 percent of worldwide generation.
Perhaps in the 21st century the following inventions will be standard science, and a history student may wonder why 20th-century pundits disregarded them.
THE SPACE ENERGY CONVERTER
This class of inventions could wipe out oil crises and help solve environmental problems. More commonly called free energy or fuel-less electric generators, they put out more power than goes into them from any previously recognized source. No batteries, no fuel tank and no link with a wall socket. Instead, they tap an invisible source of power. Such unorthodox clean energy-producing devices exist today and were built as far back as the l9th century.
Forget the Rube Goldberg mechanical perpetual motion contraptions; they had to stop eventually. In contrast, new solid-state (no moving parts) energy converters are said to draw from an energy field in surrounding space. This source of abundant power is known by physicists as the zero-point quantum fluctuations of vacuum space. Zero-point refers to the fact that even at a temperature at which heat movement in molecules stops cold, zero degrees Kelvin, there is still a jiggling movement, said to be from inter-dimensional fluctuations or cosmic energy. Magnetism and vortexian or spin-upon-a-spin motions seem to line up these random fluctuations of space and put them to work, as in the Searl Effect (Atlantis Rising, first issue).
Inventors give various names to their space-energy converters. In the 1930s a scientist in Utah, T. Henry Moray, invented a Radiant Energy device powered from the sea of energy in which the earth floats. This sea that surrounds us, Moray said, is packed with rays which constantly pierce the earth from all directions, perhaps from countless galaxies. Converting this cosmic background radiation into a strange cold form of electricity, his device lit incandescent bulbs, heated a flat iron and ran a motor. His sons say he was thanked with bullets and other harassments, but that's another story.
A spiritual commune in Switzerland had a tabletop free energy device running in greenhouses for years, but members feared that outsiders would turn the technology into weaponry. Before the commune closed its doors to snoopers, European engineers witnessed the converter putting out thousands of watts. However, most other unorthodox energy technologies are still at the stage of unreliable, crude prototypes. (So was the Wrights first airplane; it only flew about a hundred feet.)
The inventor of AC (alternating current) electrical generating and transmission systems, the genius Nikola Tesla (1857-1943), was said to have run a Pierce-Arrow car on a free energy device in the 1930s. Although that's difficult to document now, we have his word that it's possible. It is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature, said Tesla.
It may have been done before Tesla's time. Among the free energy inventions of John Worrell Keely (1827-1898) is the Hydro Pneumo-Pulsating-Vacuo motor that used cavitation (implosion) of water. Although Keely reached an advanced understanding of the science of vibrations, he failed to develop machines which other people could operate. Progress continues from other directions, a company in Georgia is selling water cavitation devices that range from 110 per cent to 300 per cent efficient.
Up in Vancouver, Canada, Tesla researcher John Hutchison says he has a feel for the natural flows of a subtle primal energy. In the spring of 1995 he showed his latest invention to the author and a mechanical engineer. The Hutchison Converter involves crystalline materials and the principle of electrical resonance. He twirls a few knobs to tune it, and the energy flow is amplified until it runs a one-inch diameter Radio Shack motor. The whirring of a small propeller isn't too impressive until you remember that there are no batteries and the device runs for days at a time.
The garage inventors come from many backgrounds. Wingate Lambertson Ph.D. of Florida, former executive director of Kentucky's science and technology commission, invented a device which converts the space energy fluctuations into electricity which lights a row of lamps. This dignified former professor took a roundabout route to the free-energy scene. In the mid-1960s he read There Is a River by Thomas Sugree, who writes about the destruction of Atlantis through misuse of a crystal energy collector. Lambertson's psychic friend later offered to collaborate on replicating the first Atlantean energy converter, but Lambertson eventually turned to his own knowledge of ceramics and metals to develop an energy converter. Neither his nor other known zero-point energy conversion methods of today are based on the first Atlantean crystal method, because the researchers found better methods. Also, the concept of a central power station providing electric power to a nation is obsolete, says Dr. Lambertson. Small energy converters will follow the path of the personal converter.
COLD FUSION
In Japan, cold fusion is called New Hydrogen Energy, and that oil-dependent nation welcomes successful experiments. In contrast, two pioneering experimenters were hounded out of North America. David Lewis described this scene as Heavy Watergate in Atlantis Rising, issue two.
Update: A successful experiment was served up in Monte Carlo in April, at the Fifth International Conference on Cold Fusion. Clean Energy Technologies Inc. of Florida demonstrated a cold fusion cell with energy output as much as ten times more than input. Other companies are also gambling on this new source of heat energy which could drive electric generators.
What exactly causes atomic nuclei to fuse, and release energy, without extreme high temperatures and pressures? A Romanian physicist writing in Infinite Energy magazine, Dr. Peter Gluck, wonders if it could be only partly a catalytic nuclear effect, and partly a catalytic quantum effect providing the capture of the zero-point energy, The ubiquitous z-p energy.
SYSTEM TO SPLIT WATER FOR FUEL BY USING RESONANCE
Another variation on the water-fuel theme relies more on vibrations than on chemistry. At more than 100 per cent efficiency, such a system produces hydrogen gas and oxygen from ordinary water at normal temperatures and pressure.
One example is U.S. Patent 4,394,230, Method and Apparatus for Splitting Water Molecules, issued to Dr. Andrija Puharich in 1983. His method made complex electrical wave forms resonate water molecules and shatter them, which freed hydrogen and oxygen. By using Tesla's understanding of electrical resonance, Puharich was able to split the water molecule much more efficiently than the brute-force electrolysis that every physics student knows. (Resonance is what shatters a crystal goblet when an opera singer hits the exact note which vibrates with the crystal's molecular structure.)
Puharich reportedly drove his mobile home using only water as fuel for several hundred thousand kilometers in trips across North America. In a high Mexican mountain pass he had to make do with snow for fuel. Splitting water molecules as needed in a vehicle is more revolutionary than the hydrogen-powered systems with which every large auto manufacturer has dallied. With the on-demand system, you don't need to carry a tank full of hydrogen fuel which could be a potential bomb.
Another inventor who successfully made fuel out of water on the spot was the late Francisco Pacheco of New Jersey. The Pacheco Bi-Polar Auto electric Hydrogen Generator (U.S. Patent No. 5,089,107) separated hydrogen from seawater as needed.
A pioneer in breaking down water into hydrogen and oxygen without heat or ordinary electricity, John Worrell Keely reportedly performed feats which 20th-century science is unable to duplicate. He worked with sound and other vibrations to set machines into motion. To liberate energy in molecules of water, Keely poured a quart of water into a cylinder where tuning forks vibrated at the exact frequency to liberate the energy. Does this mean he broke apart the water molecules and liberated hydrogen, or did he free a more primal form of energy? The records which could answer such questions are lost. However, a century later, Keely is being vindicated. One scientist recently discovered that Keely was correct in predicting the exact frequency which would burst apart a water molecule. Keely understood atoms to be intricate vibratory phenomena.
SYSTEM FOR SENDING POWER WIRELESSLY
Look, Mom Earth, no power lines!
Tesla may have wanted to voice such a boast, but it didn't turn out that way; the world is crisscrossed with transmission lines for the electrical power grid. His invention for sending electrical power wirelessly wasn't too popular on Wall Street.
Before the power brokers figured out what he was up to, Tesla built a tower-topped laboratory near what is now Colorado Springs. He filled the mountain air with thunderous manmade lightning bolts and pounded the earth with electrical oscillations as he tested ideas about electrical resonance. Then he returned to New York to build Wardenclyffe, a complex wooden tower on Long Island from which he planned to send both communications and power wirelessly. When banker J. Pierpont Morgan realized Tesla could make it possible for anyone to stick an antenna in the ground anywhere and get electrical power, the banker cut off the inventor's funding and blocked other financial deals that Tesla tried to make. Wardenclyffe tower was torn down and sold for scrap.
In recent years, scientists such as James Corum Ph.D. have learned that Tesla did successfully test a wireless system in Colorado. For example, Tesla knew specific frequencies associated with the earth-ionosphere waveguide, knowledge he could not have had in the nineteenth century unless he had sent electrical oscillations wirelessly.
With public acceptance of inventions such as space-energy converters and super-learning devices, perhaps today's innovators will pull the establishment, kicking and scoffing, into a new world view.
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 28th, 2010 07:22 pm |
|
13th Post |
Newshound
Member
| Joined: | Fri Dec 23rd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1317 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Biggest Coal Co. Files Legal Challenge Against EPA Peabody Energy, America’s largest coal company, has filed a 240-page legal challenge against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, saying it relied on flawed climate change science when it decided to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.
Peabody filed a petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Feb. 12, seeking a review of the EPA’s decision in December that greenhouse gases pose a danger to public health, BusinessWeek reported.
The EPA’s “endangerment finding” would allow regulators to control carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants under the Clean Air Act.
“Peabody is, in effect, challenging the right of the current U.S. federal government to introduce cap-and-trade regulations by the ‘back door,’” the Climate Depot Web site observed.
Peabody maintains that the finding relied too heavily on a United Nations panel’s disputed work, according to BusinessWeek.
The U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded in 2007 that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are “very likely” to blame for global warming.
But that conclusion was challenged following the “climategate” scandal, when e-mails leaked in November from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit in Britain indicated that researchers sought to keep some data out of the U.N. body’s findings to bolster their case for man-made global warming.
Peabody’s petition argues that the EPA must reconsider its endangerment finding “based on all the new material from climategate that was not available during the original EPA ‘comment period’ and which is central to the outcome that EPA reached,” Climate Depot disclosed.
Peabody spokeswoman Beth Sutton said in a statement, “There is no sufficient basis to implement regulations that would harm a fragile economy, further suppress investment and raise energy costs for Americans.”
St. Louis-based Peabody had sales of 244 million tons of coal last year. Its coal products fuel 10 percent of all U.S. electricity generation and 2 percent of worldwide generation.
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 21st, 2010 09:49 pm |
|
14th Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
The last thing they want to do is get Medieval. That means you have to get biblical. I say, bring it...........
Palaeoclimatic records are more abundant then the average joe can surmise and guarded very closely, I might add. This also brings the true nature of the hoax of science front and center for the world to see.Last edited on Wed Feb 24th, 2010 10:58 pm by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 21st, 2010 07:44 pm |
|
15th Post |
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2520 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Global Warming Scientist Admits Doubts Proponents of man-made global warming have suffered a serious blow as leading climate change scientist Phil Jones now acknowledges that the earth may have been warmer in medieval times than now.
Jones also conceded in an interview with the BBC that during the past 15 years there has been no “statistically significant” warming.
“The admissions will be seized on by skeptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely made-made,” Britain‘s Daily Mail observed.
Jones recently stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit in Britain after leaked e-mails indicated that scientists there were manipulating data to strengthen the argument for man-made global warming.
The data have been used to support efforts by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to urge governments to cut carbon dioxide emissions and to produce the “hockey stick graph” that shows temperatures relatively stable for centuries before rising sharply in recent decades.
Critics of global warming crusaders believe there is evidence that the world was warmer than today between about 800 and 1300 A.D., during the so-called Medieval Warm Period (MWP), due to evidence of high temperatures in northern countries.
“There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not,” Jones said in the interview.
“The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic, and Europe and parts of Asia. “For it to be global in extent, the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern Hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.
“Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today, then obviously the late 20th century warmth would not be unprecedented.”
Marc Sheppard, environment editor of American Thinker, declares: “As the entire anthropogenic global warming theory is predicated on correlation with rising CO2 levels, this first-such confession from an IPCC senior scientist is nothing short of earth-shattering.”
He also writes: “Indeed, we know that, during the MWP, ice-free seas allowed the Vikings to settle a then comfortably warm Greenland, where colonies flourished for many centuries. Modern archaeologists digging through [Greenland’s] permafrost have uncovered bones and artifacts attesting to the villages established there.”
Despite his concession that there has been no “statistically significant” warming over the past 15 years, Jones still maintains that he is “100 percent confident” the climate has warmed and said “there’s evidence that most of the warming since the 1950s is due to human activity.”
Editor's Note:From NewsMax.com
Last edited on Mon Feb 22nd, 2010 06:40 pm by Bixby
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 16th, 2010 10:33 pm |
|
16th Post |
The Insyder
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 915 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
FTW wrote: Is it time for Gore to give back his Nobel Prize and his two Oscars? No consensus?
Global warming dominated the headlines this weekend and that's not a good thing for the alarmists. Some of the prominent scientists in the warming community are saying, among other things, that there is actually no consensus. Kind of an important detail there, don't ya think? It's all falling apart for the alarmists, but that's not stopping the Cap and Tax bill from moving forward. Glenn explains on today’s radio program. Transcript
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 16th, 2010 10:14 pm |
|
17th Post |
FTW
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 20th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 667 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Is it time for Gore to give back his Nobel Prize and his two Oscars?
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 16th, 2010 09:16 pm |
|
18th Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Don't know exactly when but the computer code(s) that proves the entire hoax to be just that should probably come to surface shortly. At this point, they have to give them up. It's been manipulated upwards of 40 years. The computer models that data which predicted global warming were premised upon were completely inadequate. In fact, they were built so that the results would be that which were desired. Should be comical, if nothing else.
Was glad to see that at least one person had the right take on the history of the hoax though. Propwash is the only person that I've seen to even mention Maurice Strong in all of this. Go figger.
Last edited on Tue Feb 16th, 2010 09:35 pm by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 16th, 2010 08:58 pm |
|
19th Post |
The Insyder
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 915 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Now one of the head honchos at the UN climate change panels admits that there has been no appreciable warming in the last 15 years and the the Medieval warming period is unexplainable, was warmer than the last 100 years in current times and could not have been caused by man. It looks like their lie is crumbling but yet Gore and friends and this administration still forward the colors. Far left Dems will still try to push Cap and Trade and use the EPA to circumvent Congress in creating regulations designed to curb greenhouse emissions.
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 15th, 2010 06:38 pm |
|
20th Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
You know what baffles me to no end? It's the fact that people cannot look beyond the bait. They just keep nipping until they get hooked and thrown into the net. I mean seriously, folks. When are people going to just quit with it and wake up? To attempt to sell political business on the premise that Africa can farm is complete fodder and spin to keep you dumb to reality. Not the staged climate gripe but the real reality that dictates infrastructure. Again, energy. He who controls the energy controls everything.
I've been trying to tell people forever that you can turn a 3rd world country into a plush farmland in a few months and under the ruse that mother nature must have done it.Apparently, Africa is the example of the day. You can also do the opposite if things don't go how you have Geo-politically planned. Sorry, Haiti. It sucks when you're a glorified Western Union in a world of business as usual. When I hear these "reports"(consider their purpose) in regard to what "could" happen, I perceive them more along the lines of threats in regard to what "will" happen if a few "people" as they are deemed nowadays don't get their way. Ain't it just amazing how weather works? An "act of God", it is. Think about that.
Do you think I'm lying to you when I tell you what energy technology such as HAARP, for one, is capable of and is currently used for or do you just like being served with chips? Wake up. Three months, it takes to turn a desert into a plush garden environment. Three months! These reports as well as those in opposition are nothing less than good old fashioned "gobbledygook" as are the arguments in regard to opposition. It's like racing to the end of a circle.
Here- http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-409531?ref=feeds/latest
The program touts that certain aspects of this technology are secret as a matter of national security. You know what's so secret about it in this regard? I'll tell you. It works off of Tesla's free energy technology. The very thing that would end the entire climate discussion from the premise people are fed currently. I mean, seriously. They are going to keep using free energy(totally free and clean) to screw with the climate so that people can keep b**ching about Al Gore's plan to make a fortune off clean energy by other means besides free energy. After all, thats a matter of national security, right?. It's freakin brilliant for the entire M/I complex if people refuse to get beyond kindergarten.
Btw, The government(The Western World) was shut down on the eleventh of this month. Why? Because of weather. Just for s**** n giggles, didn't a foriegn leader state that the US government(The Western World) would be delivered a stunning punch on that day....Before it happened?
The way I look at it is that Mother Nature has been drafted plain and simple. I just can't believe that their using free energy technology to keep people arguing over which expensive energy technology to use. Craziness......
Last edited on Mon Feb 15th, 2010 10:30 pm by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 15th, 2010 05:08 pm |
|
21st Post |
| Posted: Mon Feb 15th, 2010 12:59 pm |
|
22nd Post |
Newshound
Member
| Joined: | Fri Dec 23rd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1317 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
The US’s most Republican state passes bill disputing science of climate change, claiming emissions are ‘essentially harmless’ Carbon dioxide is “essentially harmless” to human beings and good for plants. So now will you stop worrying about global warming?
Utah ’s House of Representatives apparently has at least. Officially the most Republican state in America , its political masters have adopted a resolution condemning “climate alarmists”, and disputing any scientific basis for global warming.
The measure, which passed by 56-17, has no legal force, though it was predictably claimed by climate change sceptics as a great victory in the wake of the controversy caused by a mistake over Himalayan glaciers in the UN’s landmark report on global warming.
But it does offer a view of state politicians’ concerns in Utah which is a major oil and coal producing state. The original version of the bill dismissed climate science as a “well organised and ongoing effort to manipulate and incorporate “tricks” related to global temperature data in order to produce a global warming outcome”. It accused those seeking action on climate change of riding a “gravy train” and their efforts would “ultimately lock billions of human beings into long-term poverty”.
In the heat of the debate, the representative Mike Noel said environmentalists were part of a vast conspiracy to destroy the American way of life and control world population through forced sterilisation and abortion. By the time the final version of the bill came to a vote, cooler heats apparently prevailed. The bill dropped the word “conspiracy”, and described climate science as “questionable” rather than “flawed”.
However, it insisted – against all evidence – that the hockey stick graph of changing temperatures was discredited. It also called on the federal government’s Environmental Protection Agency to order an immediate halt in its moves to regulate greenhouse gas emissions “until a full and independent investigation of climate data and global warming science can be substantiated”.
As Noel explained: “Sometimes … we need to have the courage to do nothing.”
———————-
By Suzanne Goldenberg, Video via infowars.com
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 14th, 2010 04:54 pm |
|
23rd Post |
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 5911 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Don't tell that to Algore or Obie. They'll find a way to blame it on the space program and tax us to clean up space.
Lavitakus wrote:
You know, Mars is experiencing global warming equal to that of Earth. That alone blows the whole man made gig out of the water.
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 14th, 2010 12:42 pm |
|
24th Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
You know, Mars is experiencing global warming equal to that of Earth. That alone blows the whole man made gig out of the water.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2520 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
It looks like India has gotten the message. They pulled out of the Copenhagen Conference crowd because of the false data being projected by Team AGW. The straw that did it is the latest false data concerning the melting of the Himalaya Glaciers which is said to cause a rise in sea levels. Even the UN CC chief admitted it was false data but will continue to forge ahead anyway, ... just like Obama is.
|
tspong
Member
| Joined: | Fri Aug 24th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 4244 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Copied below is a letter to the editor submitted to the Delaware State News. You can post your onpinions by clicking on "Reply."
I’d like to comment on this Global Warming issue. Liberals and some scientists, like Al Gore, say Global Warming is man-made and causing the ocean to rise, severe weather, and the earth is going to burn up because the CO2 is destroying the atmosphere and the sun is too hot. I’m puzzled, but I do remember my Dad telling me he walked to school when he was a kid uphill both ways in 4 feet of snow. Heck, it doesn’t even snow anymore except for the 2 feet we had the last 24 hours, 6 inches last week, over a foot before Christmas, and more on the way next week. I do remember in school I learned that we humans breathe oxygen and exhale this CO2; animals do, too. All the factories also give off this nasty CO2 stuff, but I don’t know because I haven’t seen a factory since I was a kid in the ’60s. Also, my science teacher taught me, and I read in a book, that trees and plans eat CO2 and give off oxygen. I wonder if this is true because I heard liberals were rewriting school books and changing historical facts and stuff. Anyway, I got an idea. We need a Global Warming stimulus package. The Obama Administration should propose a massive tree planting, crops, home gardens, shrubs, anything that grows, and help Americans pay for it. This would produce more oxygen and also stimulate job growth. Also, the government should restrict all plant life from being eaten, stop the use of Christmas trees because they are a violation of the Constitution separating State and Religion. After all, these things produce oxygen. Now, remember animals produce CO2, so the government needs to mandate we eat nothing but animals, cows, turkeys, chicken, deer (we got too many) and heck, dogs people don’t want. They eat dogs and horses in other countries. Don’t liberals want us to act more global? I’m no scientist, but I think I’m onto something. Could you run this by the government and maybe get PETA to help? I think PETA stands for People Eat the Animals, but I’m no liberal so I’m not sure.
Barry Nemeth
Dover
|
Boo
Member
| Joined: | Sat Nov 19th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 592 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Lav, yer allus just a-sayin' so jest whut is we suppose to be doin'? Yo know a lot. Whut are ye a-doin besides jest a-sayn'?
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Governments all over the globe have their underground bunkers, transportation systems, Free energy support, food supplies for 5 years as well as a hefty seed bank built off the tax dollars that people cough up. Military contractors are sent all over the world in order to prepare and I think it's brilliant that they have used media and currupt science to keep people arguing over redundacy in order to keep them stupid as to what is happening as far as changes to not only our planet but others around us as well as what world governments are doing to protect their own you know what's.
Instead of burying a topic because it's not the political spin of the day, Why not ask yourself if they will think of you when things get really sticky? Just sayin....
Last edited on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 12:21 pm by Lavitakus
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2520 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
From The Times January 30, 2010 (UK paper)
Climate chief was told of false glacier claims before Copenhagen summit. And yet this administration sides with the world globalist socialists in perpetuating the false "consensus" that global warming is man-caused and will have catastrophic consequences. I still see TV ads making the claim that the glaciers are melting and the sea is rising ans we will all be inundated in short order. However, most experts believe that the Himalayan glaciers will take centuries to melt away, if at all.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7009081.ece
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 30th, 2010 02:45 am |
|
32nd Post |
Hartlyboy
Member
back to top
|
Bixby wrote: "Last month, Copenhagen, Denmark hosted a global conference on climate change attended by 192 countries. The goal of the event was to reach a new international agreement on how to fight climate change that would include commitments to lower greenhouse gas emissions from all countries – especially from the world’s biggest emitters like the United States and China. The conference was successful in producing a voluntary framework, called the Copenhagen Accord, to start reducing global greenhouse gas pollution.
Back at home, my colleagues and I in the Senate continue to debate ways to slow the dangerous effects of climate change, like rising sea levels threatening our coastal communities both in Delaware and around the country."
Learn more
about the Copenhagen conference and the upcoming climate change debate…
................................
From an e-letter sent by Sen. Ton Carper. What boggles the mind, not surprisingly, is the total avoidance of the expose of the false and fraudulent information regarding climate change, especially the junk that came out of East Angly.
If it's any consolation, Osama Bin Laden also thinks we should pay for global warming and shut ourselves down. And you know Osama has our best interests at heart. Tom and Osama and Obama -all on the same page on global warming....
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 26th, 2010 11:27 pm |
|
33rd Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
It's win/win for the world health organization and Big Pharma, all things copenhagen.....
Friday, January 22, 2010  By George Russell
A member of a World Health Organization (WHO) panel of experts that is pondering new global taxes on e-mails, alcohol, tobacco, airline travel and consumer bank transactions, has charged that she was given only selective information at group meetings, that deliberations were rushed and that group was "manipulated" by the international pharmaceuticals industry.
All of her charges were strongly denied by the head of WHO's Expert Working Group on Research and Development Financing (EWG), a 25-member panel of medical experts, academics and health care bureaucrats which is due to present a 98-page report in Geneva on Monday, after 14 months of deliberations on "new and innovative sources of funding" to reshape the global Medical Industry.
A copy of the executive summary of the report was obtained by Fox News on January 15 — the same day, as it happens, that the EWG's dissident member first aired her charges in a letter to members of WHO's 34-member supervisory Executive Board.
The executive summary first revealed the possibility of a multibillion-dollar "indirect consumer tax" as one means of financing an epic shift of drug-making research, development and manufacturing capabilities to the developing world that is the central aim of WHO's fund-raising strategy.
Fox News has obtained a copy of the full EWG report, Research and Development: Coordination and Financing, in advance of its publication Monday, which lays out in greater detail the working group's proposals for fund-raising. These include not only indirect consumer taxes but also greater donations by wealthy governments as a percentage of gross domestic product, voluntary individual payments tied to such things as individual mobile phone use, healthcare, lotteries, new commitments from charitable and philanthropic organizations, and the possible diversion of current philanthropic giving from developed-world causes into developing world health care.
The report lays out, and generally endorses, a number of public-private partnerships in the developing world with some of the world's biggest pharmaceutical firms. But it also raises the idea of a tax on pharma-profits from low-income countries that could raise as much as $160 million a year.
The report labels that tax idea a "particularly attractive" option for funding health research and development, and says that revenues from it would "rise considerably if the profits from one or more high income countries was included."
One dissident member of the working group, Cecilia Lopez Montano — a federal senator of Colombia and former national environmental minister — insisted that working sessions of the group she attended were truncated, that her suggestions of looking critically at intellectual patent rights held by Big Pharma companies were ignored, and that neither she nor "the majority of the members of the group" actually participated in the findings "in a full manner."
In a telephone interview on Thursday with Fox News, Lopez Montano declared that she did not "understand, if we are talking about getting cheaper medicines for poor people, how we could discuss this without talking about intellectual property rights ."
Frustrated, she says, she walked out of the group's last working session in December 2009, and did not return.
"The only comment I would make for public consumption is that her allegations are completely unfounded," replied the EWG chairperson, Sir George Alleyne, to an email query by Fox News about the incident. A tropical medicine specialist from Barbados who served as a onetime U.N. Secretary-General's special envoy for HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean, Alleyne wrote that "to my knowledge, not a single member of the group has associated himself or herself with her comments."
The tempest created by Lopez Montano's accusations is liable to fade quickly as people around the world — especially Americans, who are far and away the world's biggest funders of medical research and development — absorb the variety of the EWG's revenue ideas and the full extent of WHO's ambitions to reshape the international healthcare industry in favor of research and development for the "neglected" diseases of developing countries.
The full EWG report lays out in some detail a battery of other possible consumer taxes on citizens of rich countries for such things as alcohol and tobacco use, weapons sales, and airline travel, to create a burgeoning medical R&D industry spread across the developing world.
Click here for the full report.
A 5 percent to 10 percent increase in alcohol taxes in developing countries, it notes, could raise anywhere from $5.5 billion to $11 billion per year.
It also cites approvingly a 0.38 percent Brazilian tax on bills paid online and unspecified "major withdrawals" that was raising an estimated $20 billion a year before it was revoked. "There is scope globally for expansion of bank transaction taxes," the report notes.
The Internet or "digital" tax offered up as an example by the EWG would amount to 1 cent per 100 emails, yielding a conservative $3 billion a year. It "might be appealing to politicians and consumers, who will accept a low tax across a broad base with an altruistic purpose." But almost in the same breath, the document observes a complication, that "introducing a new tax or expanding an existing tax may require legal changes, nationally and internationally, and ongoing regulation to ensure compliance."
Getting mobile phone users to sign up for a voluntary medical fee per call could yield anywhere from $280 million to $1.8 billion, depending on the tax bite and the consumer enthusiasm for the idea, while a voluntary fee tied to airline ticket purchase, the document says, could raise nearly $1 billion.
The report estimates WHO would raise $7.4 billion a year if donor nations hiked their percentage of GNP targeted on the new health care model. But the report still holds out hope for substantially more money if "donors diverted current financial support" from medical research that meets their own current requirements to WHO's agenda.
After itemizing all those potential sources of new money, however, the report suggests that only a "balance" of options be selected, which it projects would amount — again, conservatively — to about $4.6 billion a year. That would "nearly triple current research and development funding for neglected diseases in developing countries."
How would all the money be channeled? Mainly, it appears, through institutions that in many of cases have close ties with WHO.
The report that will be released Monday suggests that a global blossoming of developing-world research networks, many of which appear to be rapidly sprouting up in tandem with WHO's efforts to create new ways of financing them, could be "coordinated" via an "effective global health governance structure" by WHO itself — an organization whose 34-member executive board is made up largely of non-elected health bureaucrats from around the world.
Funding for the burgeoning medical research industry would be dispensed by a not-yet-created "global health research and innovation, coordination and funding mechanism."
The new money-dispensing machine would ladle out funds for "new drugs, vaccines, diagnostics and intervention for the poor, as well as medical research in low- and middle-income countries, new centers for the collection and analysis of research and development data, and new authority to distribute research assignments among public and private entities.
Its estimated cost, in the early stages: anywhere from $3 billion to $15 billion per year.
Many of the new parts of the proposed medical industry network in developing countries would also appear, according to the report, to be fostered by WHO itself, with collaboration from other parts of the United Nations' system of funds, programs, agencies and other institutions.
The report singles out favorably, for example, a new and fast-growing group of research institutions known as the African Network for Drug Discovery and Innovation (ANDI), launched in 2008. ANDI was created under the auspices of an institution known as TDR, a tropical disease research program that is part of WHO, and is now jointly sponsored by WHO, UNICEF, the United Nations Development Program, and the World Bank (also a U.N. institution).
According to the EWG report, networks like ANDI, which could involve a welter of local public and private financing, government participation, international agencies and global pharmaceutical firms, could not only coordinate regional research policy in such areas as traditional African medicine, but also fund-raise, allocate funds between different developing countries in Africa, and work to harmonize local medical regulations.
It would all be, as the report puts it: "a multi-level, multi-party, multi-purpose partnership for global health governance, a platform coordinated by WHO and supported by high-level political commitment and policy coherence."
Not by coincidence, new health research networks like ANDI cropped up in 2008 — at about the same time that WHO's legislative World Heath Assembly adopted a global strategy and plan of action that mandated the organization, as the EWG report puts it, to "play a strategic, central role in the relations between public health and innovation and intellectual property."
Among other things, that meant driving the global health-care agenda "to promote a new approach to innovation and access to medicines, which would encourage needs-driven rather than market-driven research." The aim: "to target diseases that disproportionately affect people in developing countries."
Behind that new direction is the U.N. organization's belief, evidently shared by many medical researchers, that medical research and development in rich countries aims to cure the ailments of their rich citizens, while the diseases that afflict poor nations, like malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, are "neglected." Even when the medicines are appropriate, the EWG report relates, they are too expensive.
"In 56 of the 58 countries in which the bottom billion [poorest people] live, virtually every person has at least one neglected tropical disease," the report states. It adds that "95% of the 33 million people living with HIV are in low- and middle-income countries (68% in sub-Saharan Africa), and 27% of new cases and 31% of registered deaths from tuberculosis were in Africa."
Only a massive shift in research and development capacity to low- and medium-income countries — fueled by funds from rich ones — will correct that imbalance, the report, and the WHO strategic plan, argue.
The EWG report maintains that argument even as it also reveals that poor countries are increasingly afflicted with the same non-communicable diseases as rich ones: cancer, cardiovascular ailments, diabetes. Indeed, the report cites a projection that $84 billion in lost income will result between 2006 and 2015 in 23 low- and middle-income countries as a result of heart disease, stroke and diabetes alone."
Regardless of the afflictions, the WHO remedy remains "the production of new knowledge, especially through the investments in research and development." Especially under the many-faceted initiatives of WHO.
Last edited on Wed Jan 27th, 2010 12:43 am by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 26th, 2010 07:30 pm |
|
34th Post |
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2799 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Gee doyou think they would have the chutzpah??? Nah-------
More Questionable Material Found in U.N. Climate Report
(CNSNews.com) – The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007 shared the Nobel peace prize with global warming advocate Al Gore. In the wake of controversies dogging climate-change panel, some critics are now calling for the award to be rescinded or returned.
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 26th, 2010 06:05 pm |
|
35th Post |
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2799 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Hey Bixby-we're on the same mailing list. LOL What a do*che. His letters are even more stupid. I can't believe that this state continues to re-elected the stupid and un-informed.
Dear Fellow Delawarean,
Happy New Year! Like you, I am looking forward to the many important challenges and opportunities we will face in 2010. In the Senate, these will include continuing to debate health care reform, as well as focusing on job creation and the economy, strengthening our national security measures, confronting the increasing effects of global climate change, working to ensure the stability of our banking system and many more. Needless to say, it will be a busy year.
Earlier this month, I sat down to discuss some of my personal priorities for this upcoming year. Listen here.
 I am also looking forward to an upcoming hearing I am hosting as chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security on "greening the government."
Federal agencies use an enormous amount of electricity and fuel in their operations whether to heat a government building or to deliver the mail, so President Obama issued an Executive Order last year calling for a reduction in energy use. My January 27 hearing will discuss how the federal government can save energy – and save taxpayer dollars. In addition, I will be holding a similar field hearing in Delaware in February with Governor Markell.
You can watch the hearing live at 2:30 p.m. on January 27 here.
CLIMATE CHANGE
Last month, Copenhagen, Denmark hosted a global conference on climate change attended by 192 countries. The goal of the event was to reach a new international agreement on how to fight climate change that would include commitments to lower greenhouse gas emissions from all countries – especially from the world’s biggest emitters like the United States and China. The conference was successful in producing a voluntary framework, called the Copenhagen Accord, to start reducing global greenhouse gas pollution.
Back at home, my colleagues and I in the Senate continue to debate ways to slow the dangerous effects of climate change, like rising sea levels threatening our coastal communities both in Delaware and around the country.
Learn more about the Copenhagen conference and the upcoming climate change debate…
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 26th, 2010 05:49 pm |
|
36th Post |
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2520 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
"Last month, Copenhagen, Denmark hosted a global conference on climate change attended by 192 countries. The goal of the event was to reach a new international agreement on how to fight climate change that would include commitments to lower greenhouse gas emissions from all countries – especially from the world’s biggest emitters like the United States and China. The conference was successful in producing a voluntary framework, called the Copenhagen Accord, to start reducing global greenhouse gas pollution.
Back at home, my colleagues and I in the Senate continue to debate ways to slow the dangerous effects of climate change, like rising sea levels threatening our coastal communities both in Delaware and around the country."
Learn more
about the Copenhagen conference and the upcoming climate change debate…
................................
From an e-letter sent by Sen. Ton Carper. What boggles the mind, not surprisingly, is the total avoidance of the expose of the false and fraudulent information regarding climate change, especially the junk that came out of East Angly.
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 20th, 2010 12:04 am |
|
37th Post |
| Posted: Tue Jan 19th, 2010 11:55 pm |
|
38th Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Why can't we just run our cars, homes and factories on free energy and water? Whats wrong with that idea? Combine that with the industrialization of hemp and we can rid ourselves of every single redundant thing that these politicians(professional lawyers) and corporations bring to the table via their sheople who carry mba's. Last edited on Wed Jan 20th, 2010 12:03 am by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 19th, 2010 06:05 pm |
|
39th Post |
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2799 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
BIOFUEL BUST
One popular solution to global warming is to turn trees and grass into transport fuel, thus reducing our reliance on fossil fuels such as gasoline. But a study published in the October issue of Science finds that advanced "cellulosic" biofuels could emit more greenhouse gas during the next few decades than burning gasoline will, says Reason.
- Running a computer model that links global economic and huge biogeochemistry data, Marine Biological Laboratory Researcher Jerry Melillo and his colleagues projected that growing energy crops will require cutting down a lot of forest, which releases extra carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
- In addition, energy crops will need to be doused with nitrogen fertilizer; which gives off an even more potent greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide.
- By the end of the 21st century, the amount of land devoted to biofuels may be greater than the total area currently used to grow food crops.
"In the near term, I think, irrespective of how you go about the cellulosic biofuels program, you are going to have greenhouse gas emissions exacerbating the climate change problem," says Melillo.
Source: Ronald Bailey, "Biofuel Bust," Reason Magazine, February 2010 Issue.
For text:
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Biofuel+bust:+greenhouse+gas+control.-a0216331957
We should NEVER had done this stupidity, but, who asked us, hmmmmm????
Last edited on Tue Jan 19th, 2010 06:11 pm by dover-diva
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 19th, 2010 04:52 pm |
|
40th Post |
FTW
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 20th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 667 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Nobody wants to talk about global warming anymore. Now it appears that the UN also lied to the world about global warming. What do you think the Goracle will have to say about this?
A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it.
Two years ago the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a benchmark report that was claimed to incorporate the latest and most detailed research into the impact of global warming. A central claim was the world's glaciers were melting so fast that those in the Himalayas could vanish by 2035.
In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC's 2007 report.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177.ece
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 15th, 2010 07:17 pm |
|
41st Post |
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Ah. Now you're gettin it. Except that climate doesn't drive any orbit. It's the other way around. Magnetics and physics at work, really.NASA is a genuine disinformation group so the only thing left are the moral physicists who actually disclose the true science behind our global situation and subsequent future. The book of Revelation is a winner too.
Might want to start questioning why all of these underground and connecting cities are being built on every continent all over the world because the politicians (lawyers n such) ain't tellin. When you're government just "disappears" off the face of the planet one day, the "crash" that newshounds source misunderstands and subsequently disinforms people of is beginning. And it isn't going to be a pretty picture, folks. So some say, anyhow.
Last edited on Fri Jan 15th, 2010 08:30 pm by Lavitakus
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 15th, 2010 06:38 pm |
|
42nd Post |
Newshound
Member
| Joined: | Fri Dec 23rd, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1317 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Its Time to Worry about Global COOLING
Kevin Roeten
Solar scientists predict that, by 2020, the sun will be starting into its weakest solar cycle of the past two centuries. They say this will likely lead to unusually cool conditions on Earth. It is also predicted that this cool period will go much longer than the normal 11 year cycle, as the Little Ice Age did. The climate threat is actually cooling, especially to countries like Canada. On the northern limit to agriculture in the world, very little cooling would likely destroy much of its food crops.
The Little Ice Age—the coldest period in the past 1500 years—corresponded perfectly with the Maunder Minimum. There was virtually no sunspot activity for almost seven decades in the Maunder Minimum(per Willie Soon/ Harvard/Astrophysics). It turns out that for those 60-70 years the northern half of our globe was in a deep freeze. The New York harbor froze, allowing walkers to journey from Manhattan to Staten Island, and the Vikings abandoned Greenland--a once verdant land that became tundra. In that Little Ice Age, Finland lost 1/3 of its population and Iceland 1/2.
In the well-known 11-year “Schwabe” sunspot cycle, the output of the sun varies by about 0.1%. Sunspots are violent storms on the surface of the sun. Marine productivity and total irradiance match very well with records that have been kept for centuries on visible sunspots. Hundreds of studies of sunspots and earthly climate indicators(tree rings in Russia’s Kola Peninsula, to water levels of the Nile) show exactly the same thing—that the sun drives climate change.
Even though it has been discovered that the sun is brighter now than anytime in the past 8000 years, the increase in solar output was not calculated to be sufficient to cause all of the past century’s modest warming. But that amplifier was discovered(starting in 2002) with scientific papers from Veizer, Shaviv, Carslaw, and most recently Svendsmark(Danish National Space Agency).
All these scientists have proven(particularly w/Svendsmark) that the sun’s protective solar wind(from sunspots) blows away deep-space cosmic rays. With fewer sunspots there is less solar wind, more cosmic rays, and more cloud formation from those cosmic rays. More cloud formation means more cooling effect on the planet.
In a 2003 poll, 2/3 of more than 530 climate scientists from 27 countries did not believe greenhouse gases were the main reason for global warming
. In fact, overlays of CO2 variations show little correlation with earth’s climate on long, medium, and even short time scales. The science is nowhere near settled.
Nigel Weiss(Mathematical Astrophysics/Cambridge) states that “Variable behavior of the sun is an obvious explanation.” He admits that we are now living in a period of abnormally high solar activity, and that these hyperactive periods do not last long(50-100 years), then you get a crash. “It’s a boom-bust system, and I would expect a crash soon.” And when the crash occurs, the Earth can cool dramatically.
Dr. Kukla(Czechoslovakian Academy of Sciences) say he and many others realize that global warming always precedes an ice age. Each lasts about 100,000 years, punctuated by briefer, warmer periods called interglacials. We are in an interglacial now. This ongoing cycle closely matches cyclic variations in Earth’s orbit around the sun. Kukla says “The relationship is just too clear and consistent to allow reasonable doubt. It’s either that, or climate drives orbit, and that just doesn’t make sense.”
No one knows when a ‘crash’ will occur, but scientists expect it soon. Mainly because the sun’s polar field is now at its weakest since measurements began in the 1950’s. A deep crash last occurred in the 17th century—and it was the Little Ice Age, or the Maunder Minimum. “Having a ‘crash’ would certainly allow us to pin down the sun’s true level of influence on the earth’s climate,” concludes Dr. Weiss. “Then we will be able to act on fact, rather than from fear.”
It’s not likely greenhouse ‘gassers’ will be converted in 12 years. They’ll be busy looking for something humans have done to make it so cold.
Kevin Roeten
http://kevinroeten.us/
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 14th, 2010 02:18 am |
|
43rd Post |
| Posted: Wed Jan 13th, 2010 07:01 pm |
|
44th Post |
The Insyder
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 915 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Global warming out, climate change in
The current decade long cooling trend has thrown a wrench into the alarmists trying to sell America the 'we are burning up' tale. It's a little tough to buy that the globe is warming when there is snow in Florida. So, progressives do what they do best and change the argument. No longer is it global warming, it's climate change. It's an old trick and they are doing it again. Glenn talks about the latest from the climate hoax crowd. ( Transcript , Insider Audio)
Here's another one that doesn't help Al Gore's case: Hybrids don't help much
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Last edited on Wed Jan 13th, 2010 11:04 pm by Lavitakus
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
The free energy topic tells you everything but you must read links within links within links to get to the big picture. Actually free energy is only the tip of the ice burg.
The development of this technology by our Military Industrial complex will blow you're mind....literally. On a side note, what do you think makes a "ufo" work, DD? It's basically just a free energy device. If you think you cannot man the device and break the time barrier then think again. This is what proves e=mc squared wrong.There are many, many other applications of this technology which is derived from a true understanding of e=mc squared.
All I care about though is free energy for us common folk while we play the "End Game". Look that up, btw. Actually the youtube series linked below covers it better.
Last edited on Thu Jan 14th, 2010 04:29 am by Lavitakus
|
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2799 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Lav: you are laconic in your writings to say the least. Just an observation 
However, I did go to amazon and there are many books that disprove this theory of E=MC2. Here is an excerpt from one- (did I help or just make it worse??)
To get at the origins of E=mc2, the poster-child for Einstein's special theory of relativity, they must delve into deep principles of science and wield a good deal of mathematics. They do it well, aside from a few too many digressions and an over-optimistic attitude that "you will have a go with the maths even if you have no prior experience at all". It means some of the crucial exploration of relativity is tangled up with a simultaneous attempt to explain the basics of algebra.
Nevertheless, they have blazed a clear trail into forbidding territory, from the mathematical structure of space-time all the way to atom bombs, astrophysics and the origin of mass. And if special relativity isn't enough for you, there's a final-chapter taster of Einstein's more difficult theory, general relativity, and its weird world of warped space-time.
Last edited on Sun Jan 3rd, 2010 08:50 pm by dover-diva
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
I know. Apparently, the truth do sting a bit. But that's OK. It's preferable and more productive in the grand scheme of things. Do you have any idea how long I waited for a topic like this with a specific reference to what would be deemed a hoax of science. I can tell you that it was a very long time. Sometimes you just have to let people take baby steps on their own in order for them to wake up.
But I don't have to tell you that. You're a smart man.
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2067 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Please don't shoot the messenger. I'm only helping to inform you of what NASA and every government and science organization that should refuses.
This is part 48 of 51 because it's relavent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52VLsW85jrg&feature=related
Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLh4xwQCMDg starts with the Free Masons, who's origin is "perceived" to be lost in history. If you want the rest, it is also there for you. Those who start there at part 1 , I predict, will certainly finish the series because it is simply astounding.
Last edited on Sun Jan 3rd, 2010 05:21 am by Lavitakus
|
| Current time is 05:34 pm | Page: 1 2   |
|
