USEDUP
Member
| Joined: | Tue Mar 31st, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 80 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Ecuse me for dragging "religion" into it ...... but now more than ever we should be dealing with our spirituality !!
I don't think Obama is quite intelligent or crafty enough to be the anti-christ...but he may be the one to usher him in !!!!
I give you a couple of scriptures of end time prohesy....
(Daniel 8:23-25) And in the end time of their rule, when evil men are at their worst state, a ruler with a powerful look and able to understand mysterious sayings, shall rise up.
And he will have very great power, but his power is not from himself (it is spiritual): and he shall destroy terribly, and shall be successful, and accomplish, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
And through his policy also he shall spread deceit; and he shall exalt himself in his own heart, and in the name of peace he shall destroy many. He shall also stand up against Christ; but he shall be destroyed by Him and not by humans."
from Revelation 13 :
And he causes everyone, the unknown and the famous, rich and poor, free and those in prison, to receive a mark either in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
So that no one may buy or sell, except for those that have either the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
In this lies wisdom. Let him that has understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is 666."
Everyone will soon discover who the true GOD is , and that "the word" is no fairy tale!!!
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Yes FTW! Obama is taunting the oppostion. His cute remark about there being no "asteroids (falling from the sky)" is so juvenile and jingoistic as to be school yard taunting by the President of The United States! This clown is "unpresidential" and he could care less - Obama is about as far from being presidential as it gets.
He joked about terestial bodies not falling from the heavens and we are facing a cataclysmic national debt that ain't funny and will soon be dropped onto the head of every citizen in America because of Obama's spending on health insurance and his squandering of our wealth. Somebody will pay and pay dearly for what Barack Obama has been doing to America.
He is so stupid he can't make a connection between sharing the wealth and sharing a debt this country cannot afford! I say he's intentionally driving America into bankruptsy because this is what this man is doing and seems to be enjoying himself while doing it.
Obama is nothing much more than a punk from Chicago with no business being in the White House. Taking his girls to Africa on a visit to his "roots" took the cake!
"Taunting" showed us this man is unworthy of being the President. An asteroid is headed towards America and it is called the, "VAT."
Obama is counting on a Value Added Tax to create the flow of cash needed by Congress to float America's (Barack Obama's) debt. He put that other clown, Alan "Kiddo" Simpson, on a special debt financing panel to create the VAT and no matter at what percentage the tax is intially, it will go higher very quickly - this thing is insidious!
You won't like how it (most likely) will work. A CYA bipartisan finance commission will be empaneled by the president to evaluated and reccommend "adjusting" the VAT annually to service the national debt. How fast trillions of the debt is paid down saves US treasury dollars, so tax rises are easily justifiable.
In Europe, changes to the VAT rate in the UK happens in Brussels, so it can't be blamed on the British Government. We'd call that a "Ponsy scheme" and Barack Obama knows how to create a VAT ponsy scheme in America. All the college mush-heads and teachers and union members will soon wish Obama was but a nightmare and you will wake up and America will still be like it once was. You voted for a "fundamental change" so live with what you wanted and got it. Here comes the Obama "asteroids" directly at you!
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2594 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
This isn't really a relevant forum for discussion of such things anyhow. I just threw it out there to see what kind of response I got from it. It would do some well to pay attention to the science community though. Interesting things are being addressed, all things within scope considered.
I think there is a status quo documentary on the Masons this wed on History International at 8pm if anyone is interested in such topics.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2692 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Two Cents wrote: Lavitakus wrote: It's located on the border of Israel as you enter from Egypt. Beyond that though, What do you think the various aspects of the structure mean? There are several different aspects, all with a profound meaning. A clear sign of just exactly who runs the show in the middle east... among other places.
I know what certain aspects of the monument mean to Freemasons. Feel free to enlighten me as to what you believe they mean. So what? One can find symbols of Freemasonry around the world. It's devious if you are of the belief that Freemasons control the world. Just look at Washington DC. Some claim that the layout of the District is based on Mason symbols.
|
Two Cents
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 1st, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1670 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Lavitakus wrote: It's located on the border of Israel as you enter from Egypt. Beyond that though, What do you think the various aspects of the structure mean? There are several different aspects, all with a profound meaning. A clear sign of just exactly who runs the show in the middle east... among other places.
I know what certain aspects of the monument mean to Freemasons. Feel free to enlighten me as to what you believe they mean.
|
CaptainObvious
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 1394 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Hartlyboy wrote: Uh, Cap'n , you are aware that Gen. Petraeus personally called the head of the IDF and told him that the reporting about his report to Congress was taken totally out of context and to disregard those accusations that you highlighted?
I'm going by the article Bixby posted which was commentary by a conservative (Buchanan). So its not like its a liberal biased article
No, I hadn't heard that what you said about Patraeus, but he could have been trying to save face also.
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2594 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
It's located on the border of Israel as you enter from Egypt. Beyond that though, What do you think the various aspects of the structure mean? There are several different aspects, all with a profound meaning. A clear sign of just exactly who runs the show in the middle east... among other places. Last edited on Sat Mar 27th, 2010 03:53 pm by Lavitakus
|
Two Cents
Member
| Joined: | Mon Oct 1st, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1670 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Lavitakus wrote:
What's this thing?
A monument to and by Freemasons. Anybody know where it is located?
|
FTW
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 20th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 877 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
get_involved_de wrote: FTW wrote:
He needs to be reminded that he is not "Supreme Leader" yet.
This about sums it up.
SERIOUSLY! FTW, YOU CAN NOT BE SERIOUS! THAT PICTURE IS SO PHOTOSHOPPED! IT LOOKS LIKE YOU DID IT! COULDN'T YOU EVEN GET A PROFESSIONAL TO DO IT? Thanks for the bump. By the way, I am not deaf, you do not have to yell.
|
get_involved_de
Member
| Joined: | Wed Nov 25th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
FTW wrote:
He needs to be reminded that he is not "Supreme Leader" yet.
This about sums it up.
SERIOUSLY! FTW, YOU CAN NOT BE SERIOUS! THAT PICTURE IS SO PHOTOSHOPPED! IT LOOKS LIKE YOU DID IT! COULDN'T YOU EVEN GET A PROFESSIONAL TO DO IT?
|
Hartlyboy
Member
back to top
|
Uh, Cap'n , you are aware that Gen. Petraeus personally called the head of the IDF and told him that the reporting about his report to Congress was taken totally out of context and to disregard those accusations that you highlighted? Last edited on Sat Mar 27th, 2010 03:01 am by Hartlyboy
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2594 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Cobra wrote: Halvah wrote:
What are the facts?
A city of many nationalities. Before the end of the 1967 Six-Day War, during which the Israeli Defense Forces re-conquered Jerusalem from the Jordanians, claims to Jerusalem being a Moslem holy city were rarely, if ever, asserted. Jerusalem had always been a city in which many religions and nationalities lived side by side. It was only after the old city was back in Jewish hands that the Moslem Arabs declared their willingness to wage “jihad” (holy war) to bring the city back into Arab possession.
The notion to call Jerusalem an Islamic holy city has only come about in modern times, especially after the Arabs lost the city to Israel in the Six-Day War. It now has gained currency by dint of constant repetition. The basis for the claim is that Jerusalem does indeed contain an Islamic holy site, namely the Temple Mount (sacred to both Moslems and Jews) with its two mosques, El Aksa and the Dome of the Rock. It is the place from which Mohammed is believed to have ascended to heaven. Mohammed never set foot in Jerusalem. But aware that it was the holy city of Christians and Jews, and wishing to convert them to his new religion, he commanded his followers to build a mosque in Jerusalem. But never in Moslem history did this mosque compare in significance to the Moslem holy cities of Mecca and Medina — cities that no “infidel” may visit.
A tenuous Moslem claim. It’s on the basis of this religious tradition that the Moslems designated the entire Jewish Temple Mount to be their holy site. The Israeli Government, in its constant spirit of accommodation to Moslem sensibilities, has largely acceded to this tradition and has put the area in and around the two mosques entirely under Moslem control. But how would Christians feel if, instead of from the Temple Mount, Moslem tradition had Mohammed ascend from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and if the Moslem Arabs were to claim that site as their property? The Christian world, often ready to consent to Moslem claims against Jews and Israelis, would be greatly astonished and would certainly resist such claim. But Moslem Arab assertiveness doesn’t end there. On the tenuous claim of their right to the Temple Mount, they have construed a claim to the entire city of Jerusalem (or at the very least to its eastern part), which they have declared to be their “third holiest city”. And it would be an insult to all Moslems and all Arabs to leave the city in the hands of the “infidel Jews”.
Jerusalem: Never an Arab capital. But the city of Jerusalem — in contrast to Baghdad, Cairo, and Damascus — has never played any major role in the political and religious lives of the Moslem Arabs. It was never a political center, never a national or even a provincial or sub-provincial capital of any country since biblical times. It was the site of one Moslem holy place, but otherwise a backwater to the Arabs. The passion for Jerusalem was not discovered by the Moslem Arabs until most recent history.
A center of Jewish life. Jerusalem has stood at the center of the Jewish people’s national life since King David made it the capital of his kingdom in 1003 BCE. It remained the capital until the kingdom was conquered by the Babylonians 400 years later. After the return from Babylonian exile, Jerusalem again served as the capital of the Jewish people for the next five and a half centuries.
Jews are not the usurpers in Jerusalem. They have been living there since the Biblical era and have been the majority population since the 19th century. Jews have synagogues and other holy sites in most cities of the world. But do they claim sovereignty over those cities because of it? Of course not! It would be preposterous and people wouldn’t accept it. And the Moslem Arab claim to Jerusalem, based on the mosques on the Temple Mount, is just as untenable. Jerusalem has been the center of Jewish life, of Jewish yearning, and of Jewish thinking for over 3000 years. That is the reason that the State of Israel has rededicated the Jewish holy city to be its indivisible capital.
What's this thing?Last edited on Sat Mar 27th, 2010 02:44 am by Lavitakus
|
Cobra
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 24th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 616 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Halvah wrote:
What are the facts?
A city of many nationalities. Before the end of the 1967 Six-Day War, during which the Israeli Defense Forces re-conquered Jerusalem from the Jordanians, claims to Jerusalem being a Moslem holy city were rarely, if ever, asserted. Jerusalem had always been a city in which many religions and nationalities lived side by side. It was only after the old city was back in Jewish hands that the Moslem Arabs declared their willingness to wage “jihad” (holy war) to bring the city back into Arab possession.
The notion to call Jerusalem an Islamic holy city has only come about in modern times, especially after the Arabs lost the city to Israel in the Six-Day War. It now has gained currency by dint of constant repetition. The basis for the claim is that Jerusalem does indeed contain an Islamic holy site, namely the Temple Mount (sacred to both Moslems and Jews) with its two mosques, El Aksa and the Dome of the Rock. It is the place from which Mohammed is believed to have ascended to heaven. Mohammed never set foot in Jerusalem. But aware that it was the holy city of Christians and Jews, and wishing to convert them to his new religion, he commanded his followers to build a mosque in Jerusalem. But never in Moslem history did this mosque compare in significance to the Moslem holy cities of Mecca and Medina — cities that no “infidel” may visit.
A tenuous Moslem claim. It’s on the basis of this religious tradition that the Moslems designated the entire Jewish Temple Mount to be their holy site. The Israeli Government, in its constant spirit of accommodation to Moslem sensibilities, has largely acceded to this tradition and has put the area in and around the two mosques entirely under Moslem control. But how would Christians feel if, instead of from the Temple Mount, Moslem tradition had Mohammed ascend from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and if the Moslem Arabs were to claim that site as their property? The Christian world, often ready to consent to Moslem claims against Jews and Israelis, would be greatly astonished and would certainly resist such claim. But Moslem Arab assertiveness doesn’t end there. On the tenuous claim of their right to the Temple Mount, they have construed a claim to the entire city of Jerusalem (or at the very least to its eastern part), which they have declared to be their “third holiest city”. And it would be an insult to all Moslems and all Arabs to leave the city in the hands of the “infidel Jews”.
Jerusalem: Never an Arab capital. But the city of Jerusalem — in contrast to Baghdad, Cairo, and Damascus — has never played any major role in the political and religious lives of the Moslem Arabs. It was never a political center, never a national or even a provincial or sub-provincial capital of any country since biblical times. It was the site of one Moslem holy place, but otherwise a backwater to the Arabs. The passion for Jerusalem was not discovered by the Moslem Arabs until most recent history.
A center of Jewish life. Jerusalem has stood at the center of the Jewish people’s national life since King David made it the capital of his kingdom in 1003 BCE. It remained the capital until the kingdom was conquered by the Babylonians 400 years later. After the return from Babylonian exile, Jerusalem again served as the capital of the Jewish people for the next five and a half centuries.
Jews are not the usurpers in Jerusalem. They have been living there since the Biblical era and have been the majority population since the 19th century. Jews have synagogues and other holy sites in most cities of the world. But do they claim sovereignty over those cities because of it? Of course not! It would be preposterous and people wouldn’t accept it. And the Moslem Arab claim to Jerusalem, based on the mosques on the Temple Mount, is just as untenable. Jerusalem has been the center of Jewish life, of Jewish yearning, and of Jewish thinking for over 3000 years. That is the reason that the State of Israel has rededicated the Jewish holy city to be its indivisible capital.
|
CaptainObvious
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 1394 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Bixby wrote: CaptainObvious wrote: FTW wrote: So, this is the way we treat our friends?
When you give your "friends" billions of dollars every year and try to broker a peace agreement, you don't expect your "friends" to say "FU, we'll do whatever we want even if it undermines what you're doing FOR us".
"The Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3,000 years ago, and the Jewish people are building Jerusalem today. Jerusalem is not a settlement. It is our capital."
With this defiant declaration, to a thunderous ovation at AIPAC, Benjamin Netanyahu informed the United States that East Jerusalem, taken from Jordan in the Six Day War, is not...continue reading
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36214]
You DID read the rest of the article right??? Emphasis mine...
The West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is occupied territory. Building there violates international law."
There is a new party to the quarrel: the U.S. military, in the person of Gen. David Petraeus."
According to Foreign Policy magazine, in January, a delegation of senior officers from Petraeus' command were sent to brief Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen.
The briefers reported that there was a growing perception among Arab leaders that the U.S. was incapable of standing up to Israel, that CentCom's mostly Arab constituency was losing faith in American promises, that Israel's intransigence on the Arab-Palestinian conflict was jeopardizing U.S. standing in the region, and that (George) Mitchell himself was ... 'too old, too slow and too late.'"
Mullen took this stark message -- that America was seen as too weak to stand up to Israel, and the U.S. military posture was eroding in the Arab world as a result -- straight to the White House. Hence, when Joe Biden was sandbagged in Israel, he apparently tore into Bibi in private.
"This is starting to get dangerous for us," Biden reportedly told Netanyahu. "What you're doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan."
Yedioth Ahronoth further reported: "The vice president told his Israeli hosts that since many people in the Muslim world perceived a connection between Israel's actions and U.S. policy, any decision about construction that undermines Palestinian rights in East Jerusalem could have an impact on the personal safety of American troops."
Biden was saying Israeli intransigence could cost American lives.
Each new report of settlement expansion, each new seizure of Palestinian property, each new West Bank clash between Palestinians and Israeli troops inflames the Arab street, humiliates our Arab allies, exposes America as a weakling that cannot stand up to Israel, and imperils our troops and their mission in Afghanistan and Iraq.
As this message has now been delivered by Gen. Petraeus to his commander in chief, Obama simply cannot back down again. If he does not stand up now for U.S. interests, which are being imperiled by Israeli actions, he will lose the backing of his soldiers.
U.S.-Israeli relations are approaching a "Whose side are you on?" moment. Either Bibi backs down this time -- or Obama loses his soldiers.
Last edited on Fri Mar 26th, 2010 11:35 pm by CaptainObvious
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2594 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Bixby wrote: CaptainObvious wrote: FTW wrote: So, this is the way we treat our friends?
When you give your "friends" billions of dollars every year and try to broker a peace agreement, you don't expect your "friends" to say "FU, we'll do whatever we want even if it undermines what you're doing FOR us".
"The Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3,000 years ago, and the Jewish people are building Jerusalem today. Jerusalem is not a settlement. It is our capital."
With this defiant declaration, to a thunderous ovation at AIPAC, Benjamin Netanyahu informed the United States that East Jerusalem, taken from Jordan in the Six Day War, is not...continue reading
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36214]
What are they(?) premising that 3000 year assumption upon? Seriously. I would like to know.Last edited on Fri Mar 26th, 2010 08:44 pm by Lavitakus
|
FTW
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 20th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 877 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
He needs to be reminded that he is not "Supreme Leader" yet.
This about sums it up.
|
Bixby
Member
| Joined: | Fri Nov 25th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2692 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
CaptainObvious wrote: FTW wrote: So, this is the way we treat our friends?
When you give your "friends" billions of dollars every year and try to broker a peace agreement, you don't expect your "friends" to say "FU, we'll do whatever we want even if it undermines what you're doing FOR us".
"The Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3,000 years ago, and the Jewish people are building Jerusalem today. Jerusalem is not a settlement. It is our capital."
With this defiant declaration, to a thunderous ovation at AIPAC, Benjamin Netanyahu informed the United States that East Jerusalem, taken from Jordan in the Six Day War, is not...continue reading
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36214]
|
CaptainObvious
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 1394 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
FTW wrote: So, this is the way we treat our friends?
When you give your "friends" billions of dollars every year and try to broker a peace agreement, you don't expect your "friends" to say "FU, we'll do whatever we want even if it undermines what you're doing FOR us".
|
Lavitakus
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jan 14th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2594 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Ever stop and ask yourself why things happen the way they do, FTW?
|
FTW
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 20th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 877 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
So, this is the way we treat our friends?
Report: Obama humiliated Netanyahu at the White House
For a head of state to visit the White House and not pose for photographers is rare. For a key ally to be left to his own devices while the President withdraws to have dinner in private was, until this week, unheard of…
After failing to extract a written promise of concessions on Jewish settlements, Mr Obama walked out of his meeting with Mr Netanyahu but invited him to stay at the White House, consult with advisors and “let me know if there is anything new”, a US congressman who spoke to the Prime Minister said today.
“It was awful,” the congressman said. One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages”, poisoned by such mistrust that the Israeli delegation eventually left rather than risk being eavesdropped on a White House phone line.
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/25/report-obama-humiliated-netanyahu-at-the-white-house/
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
The Obama presidency is a house of cards with the president dashing around using his "charisma" and influence to prop it up. It cannot withstand the tests-of-time, it must fail! Everything he touches is not golden as many like to think. Health care will collapse under its own weight of buracrasy and false estimates. Obama will have sixteen thousand health insurance cops forcing people to cough up money to buy insurance. That ain't enough cops to police NYC and LA much less all of America. Obama acts like he just won the Irish lottery or a trip to Disney World.
Mr. Obama now whips off his suit coat and proceeds to whip up the crowd like in South Africa. He has put blacks, a dyke, and mixed racial people into positions of power in his dadminstration. Obama can now do as he pleases so long as he acts like a thug. Obama "exposed" himself as unfit to be president of the United States by acting like a two-bit thug with no ethics.
How has America dropped so fast into being a Third World nation? We elected Barack Obama and that's what it took. A man that needed an army of scoundrels around him found just what he needed in Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Frank, Durbin, Schumer, Dingle, Kennedy (dec'd), Rangel, Scott, to name just a few. They are all Socialists! "They've called me a socialist, Obama said, which is spot-on discription of this man, Barack Obama.
We have the perfect storm now in Washinton DC to "fundmentally change America" and getting back to individualism won't be allowed. Our children's children may be raised in a country with a third-world mentality relying on the governments for hand-outs.
Look at what education in America has been turning out - mush headed robots that think as Marxist-Socialists think. Che Gueverra is a hero to them and some think Mao Tse Tung was a benevolent dictator - both were cold blooded murderers and Mao was a tyrant.
If we do not change education in America to reflect what really is the history of Marxism-Communism, Obama will have his way and freedoms of choice will be extinguished. There won't be freedom to chose your health care insurance - it is being forced on you under Obamacare. That is another lie we were told. Obama lies! Last edited on Fri Mar 26th, 2010 03:23 pm by America in trouble
|
FTW
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 20th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 877 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
CaptainObvious wrote: FTW wrote: You see, Obama, who does not respect our rights, telling Cuba to respect their people's right........oh never mind. If I really have to explain it then it is not worth it.
You're equating Cuba's treatment of political prisoners to what Obama does.
How exactly is what Cuba does ANYWHERE near what Obama does? A: It's not.
Yeah, we're just like cuba right?
- We don't allow people to leave the country
- we don't allow private commerce
- WE have a dictator who has been in power for decades
gimme a break.
Wow. You really do not know how to take a joke do you? My original post called it the "Ironic Headline of the Day." It was a joke about the headline. I'll tell you what, next time I make a joke I will add a disclaimer at the beginning so you won't get confused.
|
CaptainObvious
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 1394 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Playing the Game wrote: Apparently you don't understand the Rangel Law that doesn't allow you to leave the USA with your wealth to go elsewhere. Apparently you don't recognize what the Progressive movement has done to the USA since Teddy Roosevelt.
It will make Cuba a paradise.
You can leave, you can take your wealth as well. Of course you'll have to pay taxes. You could renounce your citizenship and not pay the taxes.
Please, feel free to move to Cuba if you think it is so bad here. Or you could join Rush in Costa Rica (oh, yeah, that's right, he's not going anywhere).
|
Playing the Game
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jan 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | Delaware USA |
| Posts: | 6166 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Apparently you don't understand the Rangel Law that doesn't allow you to leave the USA with your wealth to go elsewhere. Apparently you don't recognize what the Progressive movement has done to the USA since Teddy Roosevelt.
It will make Cuba a paradise.
CaptainObvious wrote:
You're equating Cuba's treatment of political prisoners to what Obama does.
How exactly is what Cuba does ANYWHERE near what Obama does? A: It's not.
Yeah, we're just like cuba right?
- We don't allow people to leave the country
- we don't allow private commerce
- WE have a dictator who has been in power for decades
gimme a break.
|
CaptainObvious
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 1394 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
FTW wrote: You see, Obama, who does not respect our rights, telling Cuba to respect their people's right........oh never mind. If I really have to explain it then it is not worth it.
You're equating Cuba's treatment of political prisoners to what Obama does.
How exactly is what Cuba does ANYWHERE near what Obama does? A: It's not.
Yeah, we're just like cuba right?
- We don't allow people to leave the country
- we don't allow private commerce
- WE have a dictator who has been in power for decades
gimme a break.
|
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3281 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
America in trouble wrote: Get Involved must have strayed to this forum by mistake. The cry-babies are bloggers with no means of self-expression - "gutter snipes" if you will. The loss of personal health care insurance will be, as Senator Dingle put it, "The next step towards controlling the people." He later amended (spun) his comment, but it was too late! That is exactly what that pro-Communist meant to say.
Yeah, I myself have on average written 40 letters, sent faxes, emails and made telephones calls every week for more than a year trying to find out info, making my displeasure known, thanking those that did the right thing---------------and then I see boo-hoo-hoo claiming we all did nothing. LOL
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Get Involved must have strayed to this forum by mistake. The cry-babies are bloggers with no means of self-expression - "gutter snipes" if you will. The loss of personal health care insurance will be, as Senator Dingle put it, "The next step towards controlling the people." He later amended (spun) his comment, but it was too late! That is exactly what that pro-Communist meant to say.
|
get_involved_de
Member
| Joined: | Wed Nov 25th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
LOL ROFLMAO HA HA HA HA HA
You post-ers crack me up. Do you really believe the filth you type on these blogs? Do you think because you post it here, that it is true? With every public official flayed open for every little thing they do by "investigative journalists", do you really believe that ANY administration can stifle the press to the extent that you are suggesting?
If President Obama did half of the things you suggest, he would have been brought in front of a congressional committee or up on charges long ago.
It is too bad that more Delawareans don't look at my name. Only complainers complain the loudest. Whah! My legislator won't call me! Wah! My Governor won't write me back! Wah! Wah! Wah! Get INVOLVED!
|
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3281 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
America in trouble wrote: Worthy of remembering especially now:
Government can give nothing, including money for Barack Obama's health care insurance subsidies, that wasn't first collected by the US Government from your wages and imposing other onerous taxes on the American people. (You knew already about the "transferring of wealth" promised by Obama. After Sunday, there will be an additional 30 + Million new recipients of your wealth, so work all the time-and-a-half over-time hours offered to you. "Hooray for socialism!")
Barack Obama! Umm, Umm, Umm! Ps - The water-for-votes was criminal conspiracy by the White House.
Every bribe and pay for play and water etc was/ is a criminal conspriacy. Put them all in prison. The members of congress, the pres, the supreme court and lower judges and anyone else that can be connected (ama, aarp, moveon. org, soros, epa, nasa, ) to this should lose job, benefits, pensions, homes etc. Then we the people will restart 1914 over again.
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Worthy of remembering especially now:
Government can give nothing, including money for Barack Obama's health care insurance subsidies, that wasn't first collected by the US Government from your wages and imposing other onerous taxes on the American people. (You knew already about the "transferring of wealth" promised by Obama. After Sunday, there will be an additional 30 + Million new recipients of your wealth, so work all the time-and-a-half over-time hours offered to you. "Hooray for socialism!")
Barack Obama! Umm, Umm, Umm! Ps - The water-for-votes was criminal conspiracy by the White House.Last edited on Sun Mar 21st, 2010 01:43 pm by America in trouble
|
dover-diva
Member
| Joined: | Mon Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3281 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
jarhead wrote: It would seem the U . S . Marines know something that many of the civilian population do not.
You've got to take 2 minutes to watch this comparison between George Bush's visit to the Marines Vs Obama's recent trip. It is incredible. There is word this will be removed from YouTube so go now. Pass it around quickly.
Try to get this to people as it may not last long on YouTube, as Obama's people are working hard to get it removed.
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIHz5tevLAw]
You are right tank it's not able to be opened.
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Barack Obama is ONLY interested in doing something, "historic". He wants a moment in history equal to the MLK "dream" speech and he may get it this Sunday. America is at war in Afghanistan, but has President Obama even bothered to mention the troops sent there to fight and die? No, he's too busy ruining the country our troops are fighting for while Obama is making infamoushistory!
On this Sunday (tomorrow now) President Obama had planned to treat his two daughters with a visit by Air Force One to the country of his "roots" in Africa. And not even a mention of the troops he dispatched to Afghanistan or their bravery on America's hehalf!
It's all about him and getting himself a place in history - bought with bribes of money and by cajoling weak members of the US Congress and the attention seekers getting their faces on TV being close to Obama.
Adam Clayton Powell, the notorious charlatan in Congress from Harlem, would be very impressed by Barack Hussein Obama! Obama and his Chicago mafia have done-a-number on America and he's not done yet! Corruption in Congress is wide open after "deals" were done behind-closed-doors.
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
It's hard to believe "Insyder" as you already must know by now. This kind of information is almost too d**ning to be real. The American people are now skepticle about any such reports - too bizzare to be believed I'm afraid. He does enough to prove to me what this guy is up to and it's not pretty. Every day he spouts more lies that won't hold water. Obama is dangerous to your future and to this country's future. If his health-care bill passes, we are in deep deep do-do!
|
The Insyder
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1064 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Neil Sankey, a former British policeman who’s now a licensed private investigator in Los Angeles, initiated a preliminary background investigation of Barack Obama and uncovered 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers.
Forty-nine different addresses? Sixteen different Social Security numbers? That’s beyond bizarre.
At the Illinois addresses listed for Obama, two Social Security numbers appear with frequency. One begins with the number 042 ... the other begins with the number 364.
The Social Security number beginning with 042 was issued in Connecticut... even though Obama apparently never lived or worked in Connecticut.
One can only ask why? Is the President of the United States a victim of ID fraud? Or, is something else entirely going on?
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Barack Obama said on Fox "Special Report" that states that have had a disaster should get treated differently that those that haven't. He was speaking specifically about Katrina and Louisiana that was hit by a hurricane just as Mississippi was hit four years ago! Only LA received a huge pot of money under his Health Care Insurance Reform Bill. It's all another Obama lie!
I have a friend that was living in New Orleans during the flooding and is still there today. I got photos from my friend during the three Mardi Gras parades since Katrina. He was inside the Super Dome to see the NO Saints play. He is now a regular at the race track and is invited to "Keg Tappings" at local pubs in the French Quarter. Everything has been back to normal since the Dome reopened.
Obama is blowing smoke that LA has a need for more money than Mississippi will get or for that matter, Delaware. Barack Obama has one thing on his pea brain - his legacy and bribing Senator Landreau (D, LA) to vote "Yes" on passing the Obama health care reform bill. She was "bought" and Obama knows it!
|
America in trouble
Member
| Joined: | Sat Sep 5th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 480 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Same tired old rhetroic we hear on MSNBC, CNN, C-SPAN, NBC, CBS, ABC and it still is all a bunch of bs. GWB screwed up royally by rubber stamping spending bills sent to him by the US CONGRESS! Those fools are the people you have a gripe with, encluding the Congressional leaders of the Democratic Party. Along came Barack Obama who sent America spiraling into a cataclysmic national debth (BTW was caused primarily by Democrats running finance committees in both the House and Senate). The war in Iraq is winding down and we won that, so why did your guy Obama spend us into oblivion? Everything Barack Obama touches turns into crap and we still let that clown mess with our health care. Take a look at a calendar - it's 2010 and Obama is making hash out of America since he was elected. Try to blame George Bush and you will fail. Everything "skyrocketed up" since Obama got into the WH. Face it, he's a flaming loser! The pity is, the American people became his foil. If we could do it over again, odds are against Delaware being taken-in by Barack Obama as the country was also ballyhooed by this man-child of a loser.
|
Boo
Member
| Joined: | Sat Nov 19th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 627 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Obamatron!
|
get_involved_de
Member
| Joined: | Wed Nov 25th, 2009 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
I am so tired of the BS that continues to be spewed by the few of you who claim you did not vote for PRESIDENT Obama. 62% of Delawareans voted for him based on a promise of change and hope. Now that he is trying to implement change and hope, the minority 38% are the mouthiest.
In a good month, President Bush was costing us 12 billion dollars a month. I have a great amount of respect for our military, but they were not fighting to protect our shores. They were fighting because a sad excuse for a leader was trying to avenge his daddy's losses ten years earlier and used lame excuses of WMD and human rights violations to invade. We all knew it was about the oil, but we haven't even seen the benefit of that yet. I paid $2.80 for a gallon of gas today. But surely his and "DICK" Cheney's pockets have been lined through the oil companies and Haliburton contracts.
So let it go. I am all for the Health Care Reform! Get it done! I am all for Cap and Trade! Get it done! I am all for the Jobs Bill! Get it done!
Dear President Obama, I voted for you in 2008. I will vote for you in 2012. Your plans will prove out in the long run regardless of the right-wing, conservative, anti-everything, self-serving, ranting idiots who are so negative about everything they don't understand. Those who disagree with me, do you darn homework! Don't listen to the idiotic talking heads on FOX as if they were the great Savior and only source of information.
|
|
